10-2B vs. 10-2D

The Golfing Machine - Advanced

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 02-11-2005, 11:11 AM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Originally Posted by EdZ
Certainly for swingers, yes I would agree you can use a much broader range of options.

But why 10-2B for hitters? I would think at least for cross line motion, D would provide good 'insurance' against throw away, help with the angled hinge fade, as well as being more 'anatomical'. I supposed the real issue is that it is quite difficult to really classify grips, since the slightest adjustment can and does make major differences along the chain.

As a suggestion, I would love to see an 'examples' section on the site, with pics of each type using current tour players if possible, or even a 'patterns' section, listing out the approximate pattern of some noted players. It would be a valuable tool for the site IMO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Good idea EdZ!!!!!

TGM does say that 10-2-D is... "Very compatible with cut shot procedures." Trevino, and Azinger use this grip to play fades.
David Duval used to use this grip to play his fade. It looks like he is having trouble adjusting to the new grip. I watched him hitting balls when he was on the, what is now, Nationwide Tour. He was very impressive with that 10-2-D Grip then!!!
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.