Hand Delivery paths - Page 2 - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Hand Delivery paths

Golf By Jeff M

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-29-2008, 11:52 PM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
This represents my personal opinion on the biomechanical factors that produce a straight line hand delivery path. I think that HK is perfectly correct in accurately identifying the existence of a 10-23-A or 10-23-B hand delivery pattern, but he did not discuss (as far as I know) all the biomechanical factors that produce a straight line hand delivery versus a circle hand delivery path.

This is a lengthy post - and it should therefore make it easier to falsify my opinions if they are not concordant with "reality". If someone can demonstrate that I am incorrect, then I will have learnt something "new" and I will modulate my opinions accordingly so that they are more compatible with "reality".

I believe that many professional golfers have a straight line hand delivery path at the start of the downswing. I will discuss two examples.

See - http://vimeo.com/1932607

Click the flower-shaped button to see his swing as a full screen image.

This was recorded at 300 frames/second which makes it easier to make capture images showing the precise movement of his hands during the downswing.



I used a spline tool to trace his hand arc at the start of the downswing - red line. Note that the hand delivery path line is "straightish". Note that there is no release of PA#4 which means that there has been no independent rotation of the left arm about the left shoulder socket fulcrum. Note that he has initiated the downswing with a pelvic shift-rotation movement (hip squaring movement) which has caused his shoulders to rotate slightly around his spine.

One can therefore rationally conclude that the "straightish" left hand motion is due to the pivot action - the movement of the torso and subsequently the movement of the left shoulder socket in space, and not due to any independent rotational movement of the left arm at the level of the left shoulder joint.

Next photo showing the next section of the hand delivery path.



These 5 photos demonstrates the effect of the release of PA#4 - which causes the left arm to rotate at the level of the left shoulder socket joint.

Note that the hand delivery path becomes more rounded - mainly due to rotation of the left arm from its left shoulder socket fulcrum point (although the left shoulder socket is still moving slightly in space). This rounded section represents the end pulley section of the endless belt, and when the hands pass through this circular section, they will induce a passive release of the club in a swinger.

Note that the club release is a random release and that it happens gradually. Why? I believe that it is because the rounded section blends very smoothly with the straight line section and there are no abrupt changes in direction of the hands betwen the 'straightish' section and the pulley section (where the pulley is large). The entire arc is very rounded in appearance - see next photo.



Note how rounded the entire hand arc appears. The section in yellow is due to the release of PA#4 and involves the rotation of the left arm around the left shoulder joint axis. The section above the yellow section is the "straightish" section that is due to the pivot action. I think that the 'straightish" section blends very seamlessly with the lower rounded section (with no abrupt changes in direction) because Badds has a very centralised pivot action - note his stationary head and note his S&T-style centralised pivot action.

Now compare his hand arc to Ben Hogan's hand arc.



Image 1 shows the "straightish" section of Hogan's hand arc - due to the pivot action and occurring prior to the release of PA#4. Note that the straightish section lasts longer than Badds' straightish section and note that it is directed more backwards (away from the target).

Image 2 shows the rounded section of Hogan's hand arc - due to the release of PA#4 and note that it involves the rotation of the left arm around the axis of the left shoulder socket joint.

Note how Hogan's hands undego an abrupt change of direction at the start of the rounded hand arc section (start of the pulley section of the endless belt) - the point between arrows 1 and 2 in image 4. That represents a more abrupt change in hand direction - compared to Badd's swing. That is equivalent to a small pulley with a small radius (tight curve). Note that it produces a very fast release - note the difference in clubhead lag between image 1 and image 2, and between image 3 and image 4.

I believe that Hogan's straightish section, which is due to the pivot, lasts longer and is directed more backwards (compared to Badds more centralised pivot action) - because his pivot action is very different in the magnitude of the left-lateral pelvic shift and because his hands start the downswing from a different end-backswing position.

My general conclusion is that the "straightish" section of 10-23-A is due to the pivot action and not due to any independent motion of the left arm around the left shoulder joint axis. I also think that different golfers have different "straightish" hand arc sections - because of variations in the pivot action. I think that any straight line thrust "feeling" of PP#3 towards an aiming point (at the ball or near the ball) in a swinger doesn't affect the shape of the hand delivery path - because a swinger doesn't drive load using PP#3. He uses PP#3 to sense/control clubhead lag.

I think that beginner golfers often do not have a "straightish" section (a 10-23-A hand delivery path) because they may have i) a poor pivot action and/or they may have ii) an incorrect kinetic sequence if they start the downswing with an arm motion that involves a wrist or a right arm throw action.

Another point of interest.

1) During the "straightish" section of the hand delivery arc, the clubhead arc is still circular. That means that the clubhead must be subjected to a centripetal force. However, the centripetal force is not directed at the left shoulder socket, but must be directed at the center of the circle causing the clubhead motion and that center must be located somewhere in the body between the upper and lower torso.

2) During the rounded section of the hand delivery path (yellow colored section in Hogan's image 2), the left hand is traveling in a circle, which means that a centripetal force applies to the movement of the left hand. The likely center of the circle of the left hand's circular motion is at (or near) the left shoulder socket joint. During this phase, the clubhead arc is also rounded which suggests that it must also have a central axis of rotation if it is under the influence of a centripetal force. However, it doesn't have a "true" central axis of rotation despite its circular path, because it is under the influence of a centrifugal release force, and not a centripetal force.

Jeff.

Last edited by Jeff : 12-30-2008 at 12:01 AM.
  #12  
Old 12-30-2008, 12:14 AM
cpwindow4's Avatar
cpwindow4 cpwindow4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
This represents my personal opinion on the biomechanical factors that produce a straight line hand delivery path. I think that HK is perfectly correct in accurately identifying the existence of a 10-23-A or 10-23-B hand delivery pattern, but he did not discuss (as far as I know) all the biomechanical factors that produce a straight line hand delivery versus a circle hand delivery path.

This is a lengthy post - and it should therefore make it easier to falsify my opinions if they are not concordant with "reality". If someone can demonstrate that I am incorrect, then I will have learnt something "new" and I will modulate my opinions accordingly so that they are more compatible with "reality".

I believe that many professional golfers have a straight line hand delivery path at the start of the downswing. I will discuss two examples.

See - http://vimeo.com/1932607

Click the flower-shaped button to see his swing as a full screen image.

This was recorded at 300 frames/second which makes it easier to make capture images showing the precise movement of his hands during the downswing.



I used a spline tool to trace his hand arc at the start of the downswing - red line. Note that the hand delivery path line is "straightish". Note that there is no release of PA#4 which means that there has been no independent rotation of the left arm about the left shoulder socket fulcrum. Note that he has initiated the downswing with a pelvic shift-rotation movement (hip squaring movement) which has caused his shoulders to rotate slightly around his spine.

One can therefore rationally conclude that the "straightish" left hand motion is due to the pivot action - the movement of the torso and subsequently the movement of the left shoulder socket in space, and not due to any independent rotational movement of the left arm at the level of the left shoulder joint.

Next photo showing the next section of the hand delivery path.



These 5 photos demonstrates the effect of the release of PA#4 - which causes the left arm to rotate at the level of the left shoulder socket joint.

Note that the hand delivery path becomes more rounded - mainly due to rotation of the left arm from its left shoulder socket fulcrum point (although the left shoulder socket is still moving slightly in space). This rounded section represents the end pulley section of the endless belt, and when the hands pass through this circular section, they will induce a passive release of the club in a swinger.

Note that the club release is a random release and that it happens gradually. Why? I believe that it is because the rounded section blends very smoothly with the straight line section and there are no abrupt changes in direction of the hands betwen the 'straightish' section and the pulley section (where the pulley is large). The entire arc is very rounded in appearance - see next photo.



Note how rounded the entire hand arc appears. The section in yellow is due to the release of PA#4 and involves the rotation of the left arm around the left shoulder joint axis. The section above the yellow section is the "straightish" section that is due to the pivot action. I think that the 'straightish" section blends very seamlessly with the lower rounded section (with no abrupt changes in direction) because Badds has a very centralised pivot action - note his stationary head and note his S&T-style centralised pivot action.

Now compare his hand arc to Ben Hogan's hand arc.



Image 1 shows the "straightish" section of Hogan's hand arc - due to the pivot action and occurring prior to the release of PA#4. Note that the straightish section lasts longer than Badds' straightish section and note that it is directed more backwards (away from the target).

Image 2 shows the rounded section of Hogan's hand arc - due to the release of PA#4 and note that it involves the rotation of the left arm around the axis of the left shoulder socket joint.

Note how Hogan's hands undego an abrupt change of direction at the start of the rounded hand arc section (start of the pulley section of the endless belt) - the point between arrows 1 and 2 in image 4. That represents a more abrupt change in hand direction - compared to Badd's swing. That is equivalent to a small pulley with a small radius (tight curve). Note that it produces a very fast release - note the difference in clubhead lag between image 1 and image 2, and between image 3 and image 4.

I believe that Hogan's straightish section, which is due to the pivot, lasts longer and is directed more backwards (compared to Badds more centralised pivot action) - because his pivot action is very different in the magnitude of the left-lateral pelvic shift and because his hands start the downswing from a different end-backswing position.

My general conclusion is that the "straightish" section of 10-23-A is due to the pivot action and not due to any independent motion of the left arm around the left shoulder joint axis. I also think that different golfers have different "straightish" hand arc sections - because of variations in the pivot action. I think that any straight line thrust "feeling" of PP#3 towards an aiming point (at the ball or near the ball) in a swinger doesn't affect the shape of the hand delivery path - because a swinger doesn't drive load using PP#3. He uses PP#3 to sense/control clubhead lag.

I think that beginner golfers often do not have a "straightish" section (a 10-23-A hand delivery path) because they may have i) a poor pivot action and/or they may have ii) an incorrect kinetic sequence if they start the downswing with an arm motion that involves a wrist or a right arm throw action.

Another point of interest.

1) During the "straightish" section of the hand delivery arc, the clubhead arc is still circular. That means that the clubhead must be subjected to a centripetal force. However, the centripetal force is not directed at the left shoulder socket, but must be directed at the center of the circle causing the clubhead motion and that center must be located somewhere in the body between the upper and lower torso.

2) During the rounded section of the hand delivery path (yellow colored section in Hogan's image 2), the left hand is traveling in a circle, which means that a centripetal force applies to the movement of the left hand. The likely center of the circle of the left hand's circular motion is at (or near) the left shoulder socket joint. During this phase, the clubhead arc is also rounded which suggests that it must also have a central axis of rotation if it is under the influence of a centripetal force. However, it doesn't have a "true" central axis of rotation despite its circular path, because it is under the influence of a centrifugal release force, and not a centripetal force.

Jeff.
Jeff,
Great post,
What would happen if Badds had more hip slide ( 3 more inches )
  #13  
Old 12-30-2008, 12:31 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
CP

I don't know the answer to your question. It's very complex. If Badds had 3" more left lateral hip slide, then it may affect his hand arc at the start of the downswing if the lower body shift affected the upper body's motion in space. That depends on the degree of dynamic X-factor - the amount of torso-pelvic separation at the start of the downswing. Some golfers have a lot of dynamic X-factor, and an additional amount of left-lateral pelvic shift-rotation may not influence the movement of the left shoulder socket in space, while other golfers have little dynamic X-factor and their shoulders move rapidly in response to any pelvic-shift rotation movement. There is presumably also variations in the degree of secondary axis tilt occurring with a greater amount of left-lateral pelvic slide and that may affect the angle of the shoulder's axis of rotation around the spine. I do not have the insight to compute all these confounding variables and make a rational outcome prediction.

Jeff.
  #14  
Old 12-30-2008, 12:51 AM
cpwindow4's Avatar
cpwindow4 cpwindow4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
CP

I don't know the answer to your question. It's very complex. If Badds had 3" more left lateral hip slide, then it may affect his hand arc at the start of the downswing if the lower body shift affected the upper body's motion in space. That depends on the degree of dynamic X-factor - the amount of torso-pelvic separation at the start of the downswing. Some golfers have a lot of dynamic X-factor, and an additional amount of left-lateral pelvic shift-rotation may not influence the movement of the left shoulder socket in space, while other golfers have little dynamic X-factor and their shoulders move rapidly in response to any pelvic-shift rotation movement. There is presumably also variations in the degree of secondary axis tilt occurring with a greater amount of left-lateral pelvic slide and that may affect the angle of the shoulder's axis of rotation around the spine. I do not have the insight to compute all these confounding variables and make a rational outcome prediction.

Jeff.
Can I let it hang out there for a little while longer. I do know he does not do it enough. Hard to say with 2D pictures, I know you agree and it gets hammered all the time on threads. I will say axis tilt axis tilt and axis tilt.

Another note is how long the left knee goes forward in reponse to this move, how it changes the center of the left shoulder.
  #15  
Old 12-30-2008, 11:22 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
CP

I think that the amount of axis tilt depends on one's pivot action style.

Badds is now a S&T golfer which means that he positions his head in the center of his stance. He then keeps his head stationary for the remainder of the swing. Under those conditions, he cannot develop a greater degree of spinal tilt - unless he shifted the outer border of the left pelvis outside the outer border of his left foot (which is not a good idea). Therefore, I think that his degree of axis tilt is appropriate for his swing style.

Hogan positioned his head right-of-center of his stance at address, and therefore he will acquire a greater degree of axis tilt in his downswing.



Jeff.
  #16  
Old 12-30-2008, 02:31 PM
Hennybogan Hennybogan is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
CP

I think that the amount of axis tilt depends on one's pivot action style.

Badds is now a S&T golfer which means that he positions his head in the center of his stance. He then keeps his head stationary for the remainder of the swing. Under those conditions, he cannot develop a greater degree of spinal tilt - unless he shifted the outer border of the left pelvis outside the outer border of his left foot (which is not a good idea). Therefore, I think that his degree of axis tilt is appropriate for his swing style.

Hogan positioned his head right-of-center of his stance at address, and therefore he will acquire a greater degree of axis tilt in his downswing.



Jeff.
Jeff,

So, for a given degree of axis tilt, you think it is more healthy to move your head back than your hips forward?
  #17  
Old 12-30-2008, 05:48 PM
cpwindow4's Avatar
cpwindow4 cpwindow4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
CP

I think that the amount of axis tilt depends on one's pivot action style.

Badds is now a S&T golfer which means that he positions his head in the center of his stance. He then keeps his head stationary for the remainder of the swing. Under those conditions, he cannot develop a greater degree of spinal tilt - unless he shifted the outer border of the left pelvis outside the outer border of his left foot (which is not a good idea). Therefore, I think that his degree of axis tilt is appropriate for his swing style.

Hogan positioned his head right-of-center of his stance at address, and therefore he will acquire a greater degree of axis tilt in his downswing.



Jeff.
outer border of his left foot (which is not a good idea)? Sure I agree if it never cleared during that move, sure that would suck. But thats the deal hips move forward and the knees too, hips will open due to the left foot being on the ground.

As in another post moven that head can be dangerous, once it goes back the head can go forward very well. Unless you like to bend plane lines.

Last edited by cpwindow4 : 12-30-2008 at 05:51 PM. Reason: mistype
  #18  
Old 12-30-2008, 07:26 PM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
HB - you asked-: "So, for a given degree of axis tilt, you think it is more healthy to move your head back than your hips forward?"

Are you talking about the address position or impact position?

I think that the outer border of the left pelvis should never get outside the outer border of the left foot at impact.

I think that if one positions the outer border of the left pelvis just inside the left foot at address (by shifting the pelvis slightly leftwards at address), then one can adopt an anticipated impact alignment position with the desired degree of axis tilt that one wants to achieve at impact. Then one should keep one's head in that position at address and start from there - keeping the head stationary throughout the remainder of the swing. For irons, the head will likely end up being in the center of the stance and for a driver just right-of-center - if one adopts that practice-pattern.

Jeff.
  #19  
Old 12-30-2008, 09:20 PM
Hennybogan Hennybogan is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 206
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
HB - you asked-: "So, for a given degree of axis tilt, you think it is more healthy to move your head back than your hips forward?"

Are you talking about the address position or impact position?

I think that the outer border of the left pelvis should never get outside the outer border of the left foot at impact.

I think that if one positions the outer border of the left pelvis just inside the left foot at address (by shifting the pelvis slightly leftwards at address), then one can adopt an anticipated impact alignment position with the desired degree of axis tilt that one wants to achieve at impact. Then one should keep one's head in that position at address and start from there - keeping the head stationary throughout the remainder of the swing. For irons, the head will likely end up being in the center of the stance and for a driver just right-of-center - if one adopts that practice-pattern.

Jeff.
Jeff,

If you set up like that with hips at fix and don't move your hip forward in downswing, how are you going to get your straight line delivery path?
  #20  
Old 12-30-2008, 10:55 PM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
HB

You asked-: "If you set up like that with hips at fix and don't move your hip forward in downswing, how are you going to get your straight line delivery path?"

The answer - like Aaron Baddeley. Note that Badds, like other S&T golfers, has very little left-lateral pelvic shift in the early downswing. It is more of a hip bump - as one replants weight on the left foot. He still has a straight section at the start of his hand delivery path. However, it is not as pronounced as Hogan's straight section - possibly because Hogan had more hip slide in his early downswing. Badds hand arc is more rounded than Hogan's and predisposes to a slower random release.

I used to set up with my pelvis centralised at address, and I then acquired secondary axis tilt at address by tilting my upper torso, which caused my head to move behind the center of the stance. I now prefer Yoda's recommendation for my iron shots, where he recommends keeping the head centralised and then shifting the pelvis left laterally to acquire a rightwards tilted spine. I still perform that pelvic shift action action when setting up for a driver. However, I anticipate the need for more secondary axis tilt with a driver at impact, so I allow my head to be positioned slightly right-of-center at address by having more rightwards tilt at address.

I have noted that many professional golfers prefer to have their pelvis centralised at address, and they therefore have their head further back when using a driver - sometimes closer to the right foot than to the center of the stance. They will presumably have a slightly different "straightish" section in their 10-23-A hand delivery path as a consequence of that choice. I have no "evidence" that their choice is biomechanically disadvantageous. Tiger Woods and Ben Hogan play superlative golf using that address position style for their driver shots.

Jeff.

Last edited by Jeff : 12-30-2008 at 10:57 PM.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.