Question concerning Accumulator #3???
 

A few quotes from Yoda in the archive:

"For simplicity and greater Power Control, most Short Strokes, especially Putts and Chips, should employ Zero #3"

"Full Strokes, on the other hand, require the greater Power afforded by the #3 Accumulator"

"And here is one final, very important point. The #3 Accumulator is called Transfer Power for a reason: Especially in the Sequenced Release (4-D-0) of Swingers, it transfers the Power of the Released #2 Accumulator (Left Wrist Cock) into the Rolling Left Forearm and Hand."

Why or what makes it so that greater power is afforded by the #3 Accumulator? Other than the transfer of power, is there "independent" power associated with #3? Why couldn't the same amount of power be transferred straight from #2 to the PPs and so on to the ball? Or is it just not practical to think one could transfer full force of #2 to the PPs and so on to the ball with no accommodation by the chosen #3 angle AND still maintain proper alignments? But then I think even with zero #3 there is still the "roll" of a hinge action.