What do you guys think of the explanar. I feel it is poor product.
1) too expensive
2) does not guarantee you to be on plane
3) the inventor says you have to swing on the perfect biomechanical plane(turned shoulder)
4) the inventor also says that the shaft plane does not matter (he has told me this personally)
5) the whole shaft cannot be guaranteed to rest on the plane (except when on the plane finn) and it cannot be guaranteed to be parallel to the plane line.
6) The plane is a rectangle
Personally I would have thought it would be better to have the finn on the bottom of the explanar.
I have also seen on this site from golf professionals that the explanar works the same as dowel on a plane board. Sorry guys that is wrong. Dowel on a plane board means the whole shaft rests on the flat inflexible inclined plane whereas the explanar only has one point of contact, which means in cannot guarantee to have the full length of the shaft on the flat inflexible inclined plane.
Another comment I have seen is that a professional uses it to teach the flying wedges. Seems a pretty expensive tool to get a simple concept across to the customer. What happens when you go somewhere else to teach? Two dowels will show the flying wedges in a great way.
PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
ERROR: The request could not be satisfied
504 Gateway Timeout ERROR
The request could not be satisfied.
We can't connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again later, or contact the app or website owner.
If you provide content to customers through CloudFront, you can find steps to troubleshoot and help prevent this error by reviewing the CloudFront documentation.
Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront) HTTP3 Server
Request ID: Frtvlb6WorYNO019S8T7jgbOlDJkLm-QLH0aJgv2fqMUEYq1Tzw14Q==