I think it is interesting to note that the players that have tons of trigger delay swing seem to swing on the Elbow Plane to me? I could be wrong in this observation. But Sergio Hogan CHII and Boo seem to be Elbow Planers?

Anybody got thoughts on that?

Huge trigger delay on the TSP, would be really steep, don't you think?

They say Boo gets too steep, but I don't believe 'em.

Witcha . . . but how do we reconcile the statements below?

10-6-A ELBOW Where the Right Elbow touches the waist is the reference point used for this Plane Angle. It is the “flattest” normal Plane that will still allow the Right Forearm to be On Plane during Impact. This should produce a very flat Angle of Attack (2-B) with reduced Backspin and should be avoided for Short Shots unless it is also part of your Full Stroke Pattern. The Elbow Plane allows maximum #3 Accumulator requiring earlier Release per 6-N-0. This procedure is executed by the Right Forearm per 7-3 and 10-6-B and Elbow Location per 6-B-3-0-1.

Does it just LOOK LIKE major delay because of the big angle?

With the same equipment? Do you assume that with any of these, impact fix is the ideal, with a 10-2-B Grip and proper wrist conditions?

I would say yes. I think the TSP operates on a larger pulley than the elbow. JMO. It has to, to accomodate the afforementioned steepness. Plus a buuunnnch of dudes bomb it swinging more left on the TSP.

Where are you defining major delay? Hands just outside right leg, in front of right leg, or max delay of passing line of sight to ball?

On Elbow plane with a large #3 if release begins with hands just outside of right leg, when the hands are in front of the right leg the clubshaft will be reaching parallel to ground, or "laying on the line". Still LOOKS like a lot of delay, but the release has in fact begun.

Good question . . . I'm not sure . . . the Elbow Plane . . .is the Elbow Plane a "moving target" based on the amount of #3 Angle "constructed" into the Machine via the amount it is in the cup or not in the cup of the Left Hand?

OR . ..

Does the Elbow Plane MANDATE a larger amount of #3 Accumultor Angle?

Stuff from 2-K . .

the Clubhead goes into an Angular Motion and its Surface Speed becomes proportional to: 1). its Radius, 2). Belt Speed and 3). Pulley diameter. Increasing the diameter and/or the Belt Speed increases Clubhead MPH and vice versa. The Circle Delivery Path is just one big Pulley - no Belt, no Linear Motion and therefore constant Hand Speed and Clubhead Speed (RPM) but different MPH due to different Surface Speeds. It must all comply with 7-23 - which is the Geometry of the Endless Belt Action

Stuff from 6-E-2 . . .

And the shorter Clubs take less time to reach the In-Line condition from a given Release Point than do the longer Club, due to the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum (6-C-2-B).

the difference in travel distance per degree of Angular Motion because Impact always occurs during the "Pulley" portion of the Endless Belt travel (sketch 2-K #6) regardless of the direction of its Straight Line travel between pulleys (or of the Thrust during the Circle Path per 7-23) because both of those lines represent the True Delivery Paths and move - physically - directly at the point on the Ball through which the Angle of Approach passes even with Aiming Point procedures because The Machine delivers the #3 Pressure Point to Impact Fix Hand Location AT IMPACT with all Delivery Paths, Delivery Lines, Pulley Sizes, etc. because its structure is designed to do just that, hence the importance of a sturdy structure around the Endless Belt machinery. That is what makes the Aiming Point procedure possible at all

So the Geometry of the Belt is based on

1. Radius
2. Belt Speed
3. Pulley Diameter

So how do we reconcile this Geometry assuming a Snap Release on the Elbow Plane vs. the Turned Shoulder Plane?







Was Jack Snap or Sweep? Does Snap Look Like Sweep on a Steep Plane?

A. W. O. L.
 

This is a great thread, Bucket. Thanks!

I contributed early, but have been unable to do so since. The weekend comes!

Meanwhile, my personal appreciation to all contributors.

:salut:

Word . . . Give me some examples and I'll try to find some sequences to post . .. HOlla back.

I don't clearly understand the question. But I was saying that a Golfer can use High or Low #3 Accumulator Angle on a Turned Shoulder Plane, with Zero Shift.

I think that the Endless Belt Effect concept illustrates that The Clubhead will travel at the same RPM of the Hands but have different surface speeds. I believe that each Size Golfer has his one size pulley. He may compensate Hand Speed with the #3 Accumulator Angle. I think thats all that the concept and HK are saying. And, without a Straight Line Portion, then no endless belt effect, then the endless belt effect has no application to one large pulley for Circle Path Delivery.

I don't think the Endless Belt Effect Concept supports attempting to change the Pulley Size.

It's just my opinnion which is base on my level of understanding of the material.