LynnBlakeGolf Forums

LynnBlakeGolf Forums (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/index.php)
-   The Golfing Machine - Basic (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   swinging and hitting (http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7646)

BerntR 10-05-2010 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mb6606 (Post 76767)
Add left arm like a piece of string not actively contributing to the stroke. Then left arm like a karate chop??? More confusion. Where is the right side in all this?? Homer is probably chuckling somewhere reading this thread.

It's the left shoulder that does the rope handling.

The arm is the rope.

Work = force * distance (Newton).

The shoulder pulls with a force.

And it moves in the direction it is pulling.

That means work. Work means producing energy.

The only energy we have here is moving mass. 1/2 Mass * velocity^2 to be precise. Newton once again.

The mass is constant. That leaves us with change of velocity.

Unless you do it really fast. When the swing speed approaches the speed of light we have to consult Einstein instead. Things get heavy then.:laughing9


I think Homer would have enjoyed this thread.

HungryBear 10-05-2010 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BerntR (Post 76771)
Work = force * distance (Newton).


The only energy we have here is moving mass. 1/2 Mass * velocity^2 to be precise. Newton once again.

The mass is constant. That leaves us with change of velocity.

Unless you do it really fast. When the swing speed approaches the speed of light we have to consult Einstein instead. Things get heavy then.:laughing9


I think Homer would have enjoyed this thread.


Isn’t that relative? (pun)

HK said so –up to a point-in chapter 2
Swing fast – get a massive club head or sumpin like dat.

Effective mass = static mass divided by the square root of the quantity 1 minus the squared club head velocity over C squared.

Now I see why grip is so important.

Mass is important but weight is not - at least not where we are going with this thread.

Sorry-could not resist-just woke up and PP#3 still not awake!

The Bear

[CAUTION-Do not try this at home. This was done by a trained professional - and his educational institution (not the one he is/should be in now)will not be revealed to protect their reputation.]

BerntR 10-05-2010 08:41 AM

How about you writing "Nuclear Golf" HungryBear and I can become the first authorized instruction.

HungryBear 10-05-2010 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BerntR (Post 76778)
How about you writing "Nuclear Golf" HungryBear and I can become the first authorized instruction.

Spent a lot of "fun" time in NE Lab, playing with bessel functions and Laplacian operatives, trying to get K=1. No success- Fortunately. Humm, maybe a 1 iron moderator, Ya think??
BUT
This is a golf forum and I see the audience heading for the exits!

The Bear

ps. Both G.O.L.F. and NE are all about geometry. There may be a place for combination. "Nuclear Golf" - Get the compression right and the ball will go a long way(s).

airair 10-06-2010 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BerntR (Post 76760)
mb6606,

I think you have nailed the most basic difference between hitting and swinging. When you hit, you substitute some of the pivot rotation with arms rotation.

This discussion is taking us into an area where TGM seems to be at odds with Sir Isac Newton's physics theories and laws. I wouldn't go as far as saying that TGM is wrong, but I would say that TGM is confusing and inconsistent with regards to separating hitting and swinging. Faulty assumptions and explanations that are raised here on LBG passes unnoticed ever so often.

There is unclarity with regards to the difference between rope handling and centripetal force (what was called radial force above) that is highly misleading. They are not the same, but they seem to be regarded a such very often.

When you pull the rope, you're partly pulling the club towards the swing center and partly pulling it forward. The first part of the pull carries the centripetal force and all it does is keep the club in orbit. No change in swing speed because of centripetal force, only change in speed direction. The other part - the forward part - is tangential force that adds swing speed. It works in pretty much the same way as a right hand thrust with PP#1. I really like Daryl's take on this.

This centripetal / centrifugal / rope handling mess often leads to the misconception that a swinger uses centripetal force to create clubhead speed. Centripetal force doesn't produce speed. Never has, never will. Only tangential force (linear force per TGM) produces swing speed.

I really like the G.O.L.F acronym. It says it all, really: Geometrically Oriented Linear Force. Homer is so close there. Centripetal force handles the geometry by keeping the club on a circular path. Linear Force creates speed. It's really that simple.

Then there's the implied assumption that you can't use centripetal force in a hitting procedure. While the truth is that you must if you want to create a motion that looks remotely like a golf stroke where the club moves around your body. You can't avoid doing it. And with two hands on the club you will to a large extent create clubhead speed the same way as a swinger does. The hiting stroke is in this regard a swing without pp#3 rotation and where driveloading substitues some of the swingers rope handling.

Much of this confusion is related to the description of Accumulator #4 which is incomplete in TGM.
It starts in chapter two:



From there, Homer proceeds to present the three lever forms that he uses throughout. They are supposed to be all inclusive. In doing so, he basically excludes the shoulder rotation from the equation. Instad the shoulder turn is labeled as a "carrier of motion and nothing more" when PP#4 isn't engaged.

I think Homer used PP#4 as the partner to Accumulator #4 because he made his explanations dependent on the three lever forms. The only lever force he found with regards to the left arm was the pp#4 so he used that. Doing so he missed the incredible torque that the left shoulder pull and the right shoulder push represents each of their own and together. The strong pull that you get through the left arm during the down swing is often mistaken for pp#4 pressure and the "blast-off".

There are several ways to model how the left shoulder really works. A simple torque around the swing center would be be sufficient. But none of the lever forms is fit to describe how the left shoulder actually creates swing speed. The lever forms only covers the PP#4 part of it. Same thing can be said about driveloading and the right shoulder. The part of it that is done between the ground and the right shoulder may very well be analysed in a similar manner.

I haven't been able to find where Homer describes when Accumulator #4 is inline. I don't think he did. But it seems to be assumed that Accumulator #4 is inline when the left arm has left pp#4. But in reality, Accumulator #4 is in a very good out-of line condition when the arm is at 90 degrees to the shoulders (as seen from above). That's the alignment where the pull from the left arm has the largest distance away from the swing center. Accumulator #4 isn't inline before the left arm is raised to shoulder high and pointing down the shoulder line. Something that will not happen until the finish.

TGM:


First part of this is correct. If you don't turn the shoulders, the swing center will move towards the left shoulder and you will only get centripetal force through the left arm. Yet we see a lot of hitting descriptions as if the shoulders doesn't turn.

Second part is incorrect for a stroke with a straight left arm and a left hand holding on to the club. Only with one hand can you use Accumulator #1 alone. If the rope is thight you're using Accumulator #4 also.



Admittedly, there are several paragraphs in TGM that more than hints that there's more going on with the pivot than a little pp#4 thrust. But those parts are only prosaic and lacks foundation in the theoretical framework that Homer prepared for TGM. Thus you get a lot of instances where TGM is lacking and not lacking at the same time, depending on which paragraph you read. But as a framework this is a serious omission and it does impact how we understand TGM.

TGM doesn't have the mechanisms for power transmission from the pivot to the accumulators properly outlined. No wonder then, that TGM is regarded among a few critics as underplaying the significance of the pivot drive. This is especially the case in the hitting stroke. But also in the swing, where you may get the impression that all efforts are over when the right arm has left pp#4.

Much of what I've said here may be somehow off topic, but it makes all the difference in the world towards understanding the similarities between hitting and swinging and the common requirements for producing a stroke as far as physics and geometry is conserned. And also towards understanding how some of the big horsepower is generated and leveraged in the golf stroke. I tried to start a thread a few months ago in the lab that addressed Accumulator #4 but the response was zero. There are geometrical drawing and force diagrams there that outlines how Accumulator #4 works and hopefully they do not require an MSc degree to understand. Here: http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/thread7114.html

Although I don't understand much of this - it would a shame to let it die without any more comments. Shouldn't some of the big guns respond?

O.B.Left 10-06-2010 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BerntR (Post 76770)
I know 12-1-in-text is 100% driveloading. But 12-1 in flesh is driveloading and drag loading, IMO. The driveloading will reduce the significance of the drag loading, but I don't see how it is possible to zero the drag loading for a golfer.



I agree that they are 12-1 and 12-2 aree about as far apart as they can be. But I don't see it as a physical possibility to drive without dragging.


I agree. And when with two hands on the club and a non-zeroed pivot you get drag loading in addition to the drive loading. If you're a good hitter you will get it in spades.


I'd say that a Three Barrel Drive Loader (12-1) who stops at Top can Drive Load right from Top. It'd be a Full Sweep Release but it would be pure Radial , Drive Loading on the aft of the shaft. I could see this shot with a wedge for going over a tree or something similar.

The 12-1'r who goes past Top all the way to End has a problem. He cant Drive from End , not at the Aiming Point anyways. He's aligned himself for Drag Loading by loading the knuckle of the top of the shaft. From there he can Drag his way out of there......but then he isnt 12-1 anymore or he can realign himself for Drive Loading by "bouncing " the club back to a Hitters Top (undo some #2 Angle Radially , get the Hands at Top with the #3pp on the aft of the shaft and ready to sense the drive loading).

The 12-1'r who stops at Top but wishes to Delay Release can/should employ the Pivot (the Right Shoulder) to take his fully loaded Right Elbow and Hands downplane. But this is Pivot Motion as opposed to Pivot Work........the Drive Loaders Slow initial Startdown. It is not Drag Loading by definition similar though it is, as it isnt powerful enough to Load anything. It doesnt Load the knuckle or bend the shaft along the Top of the Shaft. Its a means of transportation or delivery of the fully loaded power package to its Release Point. It isnt even Longitudinal Acceleration as the club is not being pulled inline like a Rope Handle.

12-1 Drive Loading vs 12-2 Drag Loading. The difference is in the Direction of the Loading (aft of shaft vs top) and the procedure for accelerating the club , the secondary lever. Radially or Longitudinally, they are mutually exclusive. Rope Handle pulling vs Axe Handle pushing.

As an aside the advantage of Longitudinal is that there is no tendency towards CF Throwout as its purely inline......once the Hands start moving in a curve the clubhead passes to the outside of the Hands and you're into CF Throwout, Radial Acceleration, Release of #2 Angle. Those swings we admire so much like Hogans and Yoda's have a lot of Straight Line Hand Path and the associated "arrow from quiver", Rope Handle, Longitudinal acceleration that Delays Release until the Hands reach the bottom of their straight line path.

I think. Maybe. How am I doing here?

HungryBear 10-06-2010 10:00 PM

Original question...?
 
I believe that HK declares the golf stroke as a right side procedure. Much of the question is answered by 2-H. Because of the right side analysis i do think there is a lot of area for analysis in the "plane" traveled by the left arm. I think this is how the swing shifts from TSP to EP and back to TSP and at this plan shift,the first one, which seems to be a very even transition, makes it easy to switch from drag, swing to push, hit.

Just my thoughts.

The Bear

BerntR 10-06-2010 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.B.Left (Post 76849)
I'd say that a Three Barrel Drive Loader (12-1) who stops at Top can Drive Load right from Top.

I agree.
Quote:

It'd be a Full Sweep Release but it would be pure Radial , Drive Loading on the aft of the shaft. I could see this shot with a wedge for going over a tree or something similar.
I think I know what kind of stroke you're talking about here. It is not what I do when I need to get over a three, but I often do something like that from the bunker when I have a perfect lie. I also driveload around the green from time to time, something I used to do a lot before. It was a good way to tame the lag pressure from the pivot before impact.

BUT it is a physical fact that it can only be such a thing as a pure Drive Loading if the left shoulder is the swing center. You can't have a stationary head, shoulder rotation and pure drive loading.

Perhaps what you describe feels like pure driveloading. The drag loading will certainly be toned down enough to be even more effortless than effortless. But as long as you turn the shoulders you are also drag loading. Whether it feels like it or not.

Your distinction between pivot motion and pivot work is misleading. In a proper stroke there will be pivot work when there is pivot motion. The question of drag loading is a more or less situation. It's as simple as that. That goes for both shoulders by the way. But I guess we can save the work done by the hitters right shoulder for another thread. And the work done by the swingers right shoulder too.

HungryBear 10-07-2010 08:34 AM

This may help
 
This thread from yoda.

http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/thread2712.html

I think this may add clarity.

The Bear

Daryl 10-07-2010 09:07 AM

Good find.

O.B.Left 10-07-2010 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BerntR (Post 76853)
I agree.

I think I know what kind of stroke you're talking about here. It is not what I do when I need to get over a three, but I often do something like that from the bunker when I have a perfect lie. I also driveload around the green from time to time, something I used to do a lot before. It was a good way to tame the lag pressure from the pivot before impact.

BUT it is a physical fact that it can only be such a thing as a pure Drive Loading if the left shoulder is the swing center. You can't have a stationary head, shoulder rotation and pure drive loading.

Perhaps what you describe feels like pure driveloading. The drag loading will certainly be toned down enough to be even more effortless than effortless. But as long as you turn the shoulders you are also drag loading. Whether it feels like it or not.

Your distinction between pivot motion and pivot work is misleading. In a proper stroke there will be pivot work when there is pivot motion. The question of drag loading is a more or less situation. It's as simple as that. That goes for both shoulders by the way. But I guess we can save the work done by the hitters right shoulder for another thread. And the work done by the swingers right shoulder too.



Full Sweep Release is a Release right from Top, no Delay.

The problem inherent with Drag and Drive at the same time is that they are not similarly aligned.........two horses one pulling one way the other pushing a slightly divergent course. Homer tried to separate them as best he could. (12-1 vs 12-2). One associated with Radial Acceleration the other with Longitudinal which are mutually exclusive. One pushing on the aft of the shaft the other pulling on the Top, with divergent vectors. One pushing the left hand off the inclined plane and inducing Release the other dragging the left hand down plane in its turned to plane and non #3 firing manner. Homer was right to separate them they are in conflict when executed at the same time.

So if its truly impossible to fully zero out the pull of the left shoulder (produced by the push of the Right Shoulder and the Pivot) then you must tone it down, way down for Drive Loading 12-1. Easy to do in Basic Motion , harder in Total. I think this is the reason guys with terrible Pivots like Drive Loading so much..........their Right Shoulders dont push down plane and so they are left to just their Right Arm to get the job done.

Or you can separate them sequentially in your Downswing, which is what I do.....Drag then Drive . A Right Shoulder Throw (slow and easy one) which tends to Delay Release, followed by a Right Arm Throw which induces Release. You can go to End when doing this if you wish. But this isnt 12-1 anymore of course.

BerntR 10-07-2010 12:01 PM

The force that doesn't work: Centripetal force
 
The thread you linked to HB certainly sustains the line of confusion.

HK defined Centrifugal Force as The effort of the swinging clubhead to pull the Primary Lever Assembly into a straight line) So far so good.

Everyone who read TGM and says that Centrifugal Force isn't really a force is correct. But HK wasn't wrong either. HK's definition brings the term 100% inline with general physics. But something important is left out of the picture.

HK's Centrifugal Force is just inertia. The moving mass wants to move on a straight line. That's all centrifugal force is about. It takes a real force in the other end pull the primary lever straight. This is Centripetal Force. Centripetal force pulls the moving mass towards the swing center so the mass moves in a circle. If there's any slack (out of line conditions) involved they will seek their inline condition.

Centripetal Force is essential to understand the physics involved in the golf stroke. You guys should look it up. It is the mother of circular motions. It is a force that doesn't do any work whatsoever. It changes the direction of the speed. But it doesn't create any speed.

Imagine a pole with a rope attached at the top, and in the other end there is a tennis ball. You hit the tennis ball with a racket (that would be linear force). Thereafter the tennis ball will spin by itself for a long time. If there weren't any friction involved it would spin forever. That spinning shows the nature of centripetal force.

Centripetal Force is the force that turns a straight motion into a circular motion. It's incredible important in the golf stroke. To include centrifugal force and not include centripetal force in TGM as HK did was a blunder, IMO.

When you use your pressure points and levers in the swing, the total pressure will partly be centripetal and partly linear. Needless to say, the left arm will usually carry a major part of the Centripetal Force. But it will also carry linear force. It is unavoidable for geometrical reasons.

But don't believe for a second that a swinger has more centripetal force than a hitter. The hitter basically rotates the club as much as the swinger. The amount of centripetal force involved will basically be a function of the swing speed and swing radius at any point. Swinging or hitting doesn't make much of a difference here.

Since centripetal force doesn't produce any swing speed, hitters and swinngers need linear force to do that. The linear forces are delivered through both hands. As Daryl said: One side is pulling from ahead and the other side is pushing from behind. Hitters and swingers need equal amounts of work produced by linear force to produce equal swing speed. Just remember that the real forces we apply are partly linear and partly centripetal.

"So what about the release? It sure does create a lot of swing speed. Effortless power".

The throwout enables the golfer to apply linear force to the club while maintaining a comfortable shoulder turn speed and hands speed. Enables her to add speed to a fast moving club with slow moving hands.

If the club were release without any application of linear force the clubhead would have the same swing speed as before, measured in MPH. The rotational speed would be reduced since the swing radius was increased. But this is only a hypothetical scenario. By the time of the release, the pivot and the hands already have worked themselves up to certain speeds. The golfers has no intentions of quitting, but rather to fight against the slowdown. So you push and pull hard. Linear forces delivered from both hands.

It is linear forces delivered through the hands that produces all the swing speed. The L in G.O.L.F. Centrifugal force and Centripetal force only optimises the geometrical conditions for an efficient linear thrust.

Even the purest of swings use linear force to produce speed. And even the most hardheaded hitter is "forced" to benefit from a significant amount of throwout and Centripetal force in the stroke.

And the rope - the left arm pulling - carries linear force and centripetal force for hitters and swingers.

innercityteacher 10-07-2010 12:33 PM

Speaking of girl scouts, Daryl.......
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KevCarter (Post 76700)
LOL

Thanks OB. The speed YODASLUKE creates is amazing!

BTW, I have no illusions of winning the REMAX, I just want to be able to keep it up with the girl scouts again! :-)

Kevin

When you pivot, Kevin, or Jerry or OB, and you are hitting, what kind of triggers do you use to tell yourself when to thrust with the right arm. You monitor the hands to a certain position and then fire?

I have started to monitor my left thumb with the Pivot leading as a swing because it is so simple. Where my thumb points down (vertically uncocking left wrist), is past impact.

I think I got the idea from Daryl;he's very clever with this stuff.


YBGH (Phillies 4/Reds 0) happy Columbus Halladay!!!!

HungryBear 10-07-2010 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BerntR (Post 76860)
The thread you linked to HB certainly sustains the line of confusion.

...............
saving bandwidth its all above
..............

And the rope - the left arm pulling - carries linear force and centripetal force for hitters and swingers.

I think I see your main point. I also think it is well covered by HK. as "LAG". and by YODA. "Drag That Wet Mop" and by many a pro who will tell you they "hit real hard through impact". The club rotates about the hands, after trigger, and the hands clamp the shaft (in a perfect pinned joint if possible) providing centripital force BUT the hands have an on plane speed which takes effort to maintain. That effort is key.

Thats my interpretation of your interpretation of HK interpretation of Newtons interpretation. (Chain reaction producing great speed.)

The Bear

Daryl 10-07-2010 07:29 PM

http://www.tutelman.com/golf/design/...n_and_Velocity

HungryBear 10-07-2010 08:50 PM

2 parts
 
Trying to think of an every day way to explain.
The Hurricane- a weather forcaster will always tell U that the winds on the right side of a moving hurricane are more dangerous because they are additive. The hurricane is spinning counter-clockwise with the wind speed constant relative to a center- the centripital force part so to say. BUT if the center- the eye of the hurricane (Golfers hands)-is moving in a linear direction (like the plane line)- the wind on the right side (club head) is moving at the constant velocity PLUS the speed of the eye hands. BUT since the energy of the hands was "sucked out" when the linear downstroke became circular more energy must be put in to keep the system moving forward LAG- "drag that mop" or - just quit with your hands and hang on and let the club coast around- most people do it that way- it can be made to look pretty good and you can now use all that energy to try and move the curved part faster- and you dont need much of a pivot because that moves the system- just flip it out there at the ball, and hang on.
I was trying for a little humor in the last lines-not funny but I try hard.

The Bear

You guys down under-because your cyclones go the other way- "just transpose like the E-flat trumpet player" unless you are also a lefty.
Which reminds me- I/we have neglected coriolis effect- Go ahead I dare you!!

JerryG 10-08-2010 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innercityteacher (Post 76864)
When you pivot, Kevin, or Jerry or OB, and you are hitting, what kind of triggers do you use to tell yourself when to thrust with the right arm. You monitor the hands to a certain position and then fire?

I have started to monitor my left thumb with the Pivot leading as a swing because it is so simple. Where my thumb points down (vertically uncocking left wrist), is past impact.

I think I got the idea from Daryl;he's very clever with this stuff.


YBGH (Phillies 4/Reds 0) happy Columbus Halladay!!!!

City,
I'm kind of a simpleton and have barely noticed what I am actually doing. I am trying to keep my weight over my left hip/leg/foot, turn back, then as my hands start down I drive my right hip, shoulder and arm and Push through the ball.
For me, it has been a long time since I have been this excited to play.

Daryl 10-08-2010 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by innercityteacher (Post 76864)
I have started to monitor my left thumb with the Pivot leading as a swing because it is so simple. Where my thumb points down (vertically uncocking left wrist), is past impact.

I think I got the idea from Daryl;he's very clever with this stuff.

You didn't get that from me. And...stop doing that. :)

Daryl 10-08-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JerryG (Post 76897)
City,
I'm kind of a simpleton and have barely noticed what I am actually doing. I am trying to keep my weight over my left hip/leg/foot, turn back, then as my hands start down I drive my right hip, shoulder and arm and Push through the ball.
For me, it has been a long time since I have been this excited to play.


Jerry,

City is jacking this thread and you're enabling him by responding to his rant. I had to respond to correct his egregious misunderstanding of something I said which no doubt he has taken out of context or has me confused with someone else.

We have four pressure points in which to monitor the Plane Line and Innercityteacher chooses his Thumb. This is going to be easier than I thought. :)

Yoda, if you get the pleasure of working with Innercityteacher next spring, you might consider starting a "Journal" right about now. I'm thinking of creating a "TGM Quotes" Album (of some of the thoughts he's had) for Innercityteacher that I can give to him as a "Second Place Award" when we play next Spring. Then he can look back on his development (as we all do) and laugh. :laughing9

innercityteacher 10-08-2010 10:09 PM

Ok D, it is what I thought you were saying, sheesh!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 76899)
Jerry,

City is jacking this thread and you're enabling him by responding to his rant. I had to respond to correct his egregious misunderstanding of something I said which no doubt he has taken out of context or has me confused with someone else.

We have four pressure points in which to monitor the Plane Line and Innercityteacher chooses his Thumb. This is going to be easier than I thought. :)

Yoda, if you get the pleasure of working with Innercityteacher next spring, you might consider starting a "Journal" right about now. I'm thinking of creating a "TGM Quotes" Album (of some of the thoughts he's had) for Innercityteacher that I can give to him as a "Second Place Award" when we play next Spring. Then he can look back on his development (as we all do) and laugh. :laughing9

I read a lot of our posts and I do have a touch of ADD so I do cross-referece on the fly mixing quotes, book references and film.

Jerry has a coach's/counselor's heart, like a lot of people around here do. Yoda seems to, also, or I would've been tossed long ago.

Besides a sense of humor, and an idiosyncratic tilt, I do offer other advantages besides dogged determination. I can teach anything I learn to almost anyone and they seem to like it, a lot. And, I have a certain charming type of a "John Wayne" type walk that make s me popular at red-neck bars and country line-dance lessons between NASCAR events.

It's hard to Pivot and "see" the # 3 and the # 1 PP's. I feel # 4 and # 2 well enough but if my left hand is my club face and my left thumb is aft, the uncocking vertical left wrist will release before swivel and where it releases is both down and out with the left thumb pointing straight down.

If Lynn gives me lessons, I'll learn. If not, he has trained "faithful men" who will teach anyone, even me, how to do a sound TGM-guided swing.

What amazes me besides all the good stuff here, is Yoda's influence and ability to give insight to Kevin and Jerry during just one session. Those guys are sharp. And, it is way cool to see how good people like OB, Ted, Ed-Z, Jeff are after serious study.

And Daryl, I was born under a competitive star. Happily, I don't mind beating people I admire, like a rented mule. :)

YBGF

Daryl 10-08-2010 10:22 PM

Quote:

And, I have a certain charming type of a "John Wayne" type walk that make s me popular at red-neck bars and country line-dance lessons between NASCAR events.
You might want to play "12 Piece Bucket". Wow, I'm old or something. In 54 years I've never been to a Red-Neck Bar, had Country-Line Dancing Lessons or been to a NASCAR event. I've never seen country line dancing except on TV. Do people do that in Public? And someone teaches it? Hmm?

12 piece bucket 10-09-2010 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 76910)
You might want to play "12 Piece Bucket". Wow, I'm old or something. In 54 years I've never been to a Red-Neck Bar, had Country-Line Dancing Lessons or been to a NASCAR event. I've never seen country line dancing except on TV. Do people do that in Public? And someone teaches it? Hmm?

What are you some kinda commie or something? Spy alert . . code orange . .

O.B.Left 10-09-2010 02:01 PM

achy breaky D.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by HungryBear (Post 76871)
Trying to think of an every day way to explain.
The Hurricane- a weather forcaster will always tell U that the winds on the right side of a moving hurricane are more dangerous because they are additive. The hurricane is spinning counter-clockwise with the wind speed constant relative to a center- the centripital force part so to say. BUT if the center- the eye of the hurricane (Golfers hands)-is moving in a linear direction (like the plane line)- the wind on the right side (club head) is moving at the constant velocity PLUS the speed of the eye hands. BUT since the energy of the hands was "sucked out" when the linear downstroke became circular more energy must be put in to keep the system moving forward LAG- "drag that mop" or - just quit with your hands and hang on and let the club coast around- most people do it that way- it can be made to look pretty good and you can now use all that energy to try and move the curved part faster- and you dont need much of a pivot because that moves the system- just flip it out there at the ball, and hang on.
I was trying for a little humor in the last lines-not funny but I try hard.

The Bear

You guys down under-because your cyclones go the other way- "just transpose like the E-flat trumpet player" unless you are also a lefty.
Which reminds me- I/we have neglected coriolis effect- Go ahead I dare you!!


Only with City's help can we get from this post to line dancing in four easy posts. This might be some sort of record.

Daryl, if you're going to take up line dancing you'd better get outa those yoga stretch tights.......please.

Daryl 10-09-2010 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.B.Left (Post 76928)
Only with City's help can we get from this post to line dancing in four easy posts. This might be some sort of record.

Daryl, if you're going to take up line dancing you'd better get outa those yoga stretch tights.......please.

What should I wear then? A cowboy hat and boots? This is why I don't line dance, frequent red neck bars or watch Nascar.


innercityteacher 10-10-2010 02:20 PM

Ok, back to really important stuff.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 76932)
What should I wear then? A cowboy hat and boots? This is why I don't line dance, frequent red neck bars or watch Nascar.


I went to a bachelor party in Atlantic city, last night, and it could not be avoided. It did give me time to think, while driving home, about Monitoring the FLW, whether swinging or hitting, on every shot!

By "putting my mind in my hands," I get to preview what the club face and therefore ball will do. No surprises. If I extend both arms straight in front of me at eye level and bend my right elbow to clap I can repeat the motion endlessly. (I can feel a conflation of threads coming on.)

So that is Drive loading, friend of hitters, switters and everyone else that punches the ball around the course.

Another benefit of drive loading is that with shorter clubs, you have the simplest golf swing amounting to a "point and shoot" mechanism with the club designed to clack into the ball and produce the beautiful ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ sound.

But with longer clubs, the line becomes blurred:

(OB quote from above)
Or you can separate them sequentially in your Downswing, which is what I do.....Drag then Drive . A Right Shoulder Throw (slow and easy one) which tends to Delay Release, followed by a Right Arm Throw which induces Release. You can go to End when doing this if you wish. But this isnt 12-1 anymore of course.


Now, the line is blurred for me, not for OB or Daryl or anyone else with mad TGM skills. I interpret this "Right Shoulder Throw" (RST) as a turning sternum or "shoulder up," or"spin the flywheel" move that is normally thought of as a swinging/switter move. But if I have been favored with a moment of lucidity after multiple "Pina Coladas" last night, the RST can be used by the hitter, slowly and deliberately, to aim and shoot as Lynn does in Alignment I.

So, now I want to make another guess about bio-mechanics and the three types of ball-striking (hit, swit, swing (HSS)). RFT/EA turns the back hip enough to set-up a good pass at the ball. Does slow RST turn the front hip by itself enough to enable HSS to happen automatically? Or, doe you still have to yell at your Pivot to "get a move on" prior to RST?

I hope I have partially repaired this fine thread. :(


YBGF

Daryl 10-10-2010 02:38 PM

If you play Golf like you Jack Threads, then although I know we'll start Playing at Cuscowilla, I'm not sure what Golf Course we'll finish on. :laughing9

innercityteacher 10-10-2010 09:19 PM

We had better get some fruity boat drinks and Doritos!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 76995)
If you play Golf like you Jack Threads, then although I know we'll start Playing at Cuscowilla, I'm not sure what Golf Course we'll finish on. :laughing9

Do they have cart service at Cuscowilla? Perhaps a Minty Julep? Or do we get permission for a cooler and BOOR (Bring our own refreshment)?

But to continue with this excellent post, I think I understand what BerntR has written above:


If the club were release without any application of linear force the clubhead would have the same swing speed as before, measured in MPH. The rotational speed would be reduced since the swing radius was increased. But this is only a hypothetical scenario. By the time of the release, the pivot and the hands already have worked themselves up to certain speeds. The golfers has no intentions of quitting, but rather to fight against the slowdown. So you push and pull hard. Linear forces delivered from both hands.

It is linear forces delivered through the hands that produces all the swing speed. The L in G.O.L.F. Centrifugal force and Centripetal force only optimises the geometrical conditions for an efficient linear thrust.

Even the purest of swings use linear force to produce speed. And even the most hardheaded hitter is "forced" to benefit from a significant amount of throwout and Centripetal force in the stroke.

And the rope - the left arm pulling - carries linear force and centripetal force for hitters and swingers.



So if I understand what BerntR has written, no one, save Deity (who uses Chaos Theory perhaps (though, it's only chaos to us) to golf his ball, planets, sub-atomic particles, butterflies and earthquakes in forests with falling trees that no one hears), can simply pull with their left hand and generate sufficient force or precision to G.O.L.F.

A sound golf swing (hit, swit, swing (HSS)) ALWAYS NEEDS A PIVOT, LINEAR LEFTHAND PULL, AND RIGHT HAND PUSH. :salut: :occasion: ACHTUNG!!

PIVOT, PULL, PUSH.

Now, I believe this is what JerryG was trying to say:

City,
I'm kind of a simpleton and have barely noticed what I am actually doing. I am trying to keep my weight over my left hip/leg/foot, turn back, then as my hands start down I drive my right hip, shoulder and arm and Push through the ball.
For me, it has been a long time since I have been this excited to play.


My problem has been that when I'm on my left side, unlike most people, I haven't begun to Pivot or pull, BUT WHEN I PULL, I HAVE TO PIVOT AND THEN I SHOULD PUSH. What are the TGM more technical designations? I'm not sure.

But I'm sure Jerry G is not simple. Like Kevin and most all of us here, he is highly reflective, which is way cool. :)

I'm also sure of Daryl's advice to slightly "take up the slack" of my left leg by bending my right knee a bit, like hitting down hill, makes sense. PIVOT, PULL, AND PUSH! For most people with normal bio-mechanics, pivoting is essentially pulling to their front. For me,pulling is pivoting always downhill, so I could be adding a push for HSS.

That PIVOT, PULL, PUSH is the feeling I have on my most successful passes with any club. Only with TGM terms, am I able to learn how to do it continuously. :golf:

YBGF

O.B.Left 10-10-2010 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daryl (Post 76995)
If you play Golf like you Jack Threads, then although I know we'll start Playing at Cuscowilla, I'm not sure what Golf Course we'll finish on. :laughing9

Hah that'd be the Reynolds estates most likely. Nice place for dinner or a drink but I prefer Cuscowilla for golf and G.O.L.F.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.