Stationary Head - To be or not to be

[birdie_man]

There are so many posts to answer...(and lord knows I can't stop now)...

...

Posts #121 and 122 (almost didn't get through 122 tho...I'm very tired) are typical...and even seem very logical BTW.

That is not "end of story" tho by any means.

You have regurgitated what Homer says and have not addressed WHY it is possible to play such good golf with a head that is not Stationary or not always Stationary between the feet.

To answer quickly, my response (and there are those who know much better than me) would be that anatomical "things" make it reliable (I know that is vague but it's Friday night and I don't really care...think about it for a bit tho)....

...as an aside from the simple logic and Geometry of "Low Point is here and if your head moves Low Point moves and must then move back."

Again that is only my answer and there are those who know much better than me.

...

I'm gonna toss in a "whatever works (best)" here too BTW. (*toss*)

With all due respect, if you have to ask me, "What are you talking about; can you elaborate on these compensations?", then use a Stationary Head Center.

Uh no thanks Justin. (it's Justin right?)

I understand the "compensations" very well thank you. Glad you actually listed them tho. (some ppl say things and don't give any reasoning)

[tongzilla]

Everyone has compensations in their swings, so live with it. Sometimes, getting rid of or minimising these compensations will improve your ball striking. Sometimes it won't. The student and teacher has to figure it out. For a purpose built machine, it certainly will improve its ball striking. But humans are not machines no matter how much we want it to be.