YPE HTML PUBLIC "-/ Moe Norman's swing - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Moe Norman's swing

The Golfing Machine - Advanced

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2008, 09:58 PM
Bigwill Bigwill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Belleville, MI
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
Moe Norman

I have been studying Moe Norman's swing and I believe that there are many inaccurate perceptions of MN's swing. For example, some golfers believe that i) he shifted planes, ii) that he swung on the TSP; iii) that he had zero accumulator #3 angle and iv) that he gripped the club in his left palm.

I believe, based on studying all the material at Moe Norman Golf Academy, that all these beliefs are incorrect.

Here is a link to a previous thread on MN.

http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/s...ght=moe+norman

In that thread there is a DTL sequence of photos which implies that MN shifted planes. However, the camera angle is not directly behind MN, and I believe that the "apparent" plane shift is due to camera angle parallax error.

Consider this DTL view as viewed from the front.

http://moenormangolfacademy.org/inst...efinition.aspx

I believe that it shows that his i) left arm is not perfectly in line with his clubshaft at address (not a zero PA#3 angle alignment); ii) that his swingplane is slightly below the TSP; and iii) that he swings on a single plane without any plane shift.

If you are not convinced, watch these videos of his swing (registration, which is free, may be required).

http://link.brightcove.com/services/...ctid1494878341

http://link.brightcove.com/services/...ctid1557806826

Watch his driver swing in the above video clinic and see if you can identify any plane shift.

http://link.brightcove.com/services/...ctid1678226166

I think that MN's swing very closely resembles an Iron Byron swing.

Ken Martin of the MNGA, also has a discussion of MN's grip and he states that the the heel pad of MN's left hand was above the grip, and that he didn't have a left hand palm grip.

Jeff.
If no plane shift means that the club travels up and down the same line, the Mo dosen't have a no-shift swing in that video. The clubhead is more inside/shallow on the backswing than it is on the downswing, isn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2008, 12:24 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
Bigwill

I don't think that he takes his clubshaft more inside on the backswing if you view his swing from a DTL view (seen from the front).



Image 1 is his clubshaft plane at address. Image 2 and 3 show the clubshaft plane during the backswing with image 3 showing the end-backswing clubshaft plane. Image 4 is a composite image of image 1 and image 3.

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2008, 01:59 AM
pistol pistol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 159
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
Bigwill

I don't think that he takes his clubshaft more inside on the backswing if you view his swing from a DTL view (seen from the front).



Image 1 is his clubshaft plane at address. Image 2 and 3 show the clubshaft plane during the backswing with image 3 showing the end-backswing clubshaft plane. Image 4 is a composite image of image 1 and image 3.

Jeff.
so the plane has shifted up but its a zero shift
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2008, 10:17 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
Pistol

By my relaxed standards, that degree of plane shift is so small that it represents a zero plane shift backswing. More importantly, plane shift is only important in the downswing, and I don't think that MN shifts planes in the downswing.

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2008, 09:47 PM
Bigwill Bigwill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Belleville, MI
Posts: 254
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
Pistol

By my relaxed standards, that degree of plane shift is so small that it represents a zero plane shift backswing. More importantly, plane shift is only important in the downswing, and I don't think that MN shifts planes in the downswing.

Jeff.
This is where you may run into misunderstandings. Your definition of plane shift is different, or at least more narrow, than the TGM definition. If you're saying that he dosen't shift from the top down, you may be right. But he does go through shifts from address to the top.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2008, 10:32 PM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
Bigwill

Those stills were derived from a swing video.

Here is a link - you can come to your own conclusions.

http://link.brightcove.com/services/...ctid1494878341

Here is another swing video of interest.

http://link.brightcove.com/services/...ctid1678226166

Jeff.

Last edited by Jeff : 11-02-2008 at 10:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-2008, 09:14 AM
johnnyg johnnyg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12
When is a shift not a shift?
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
Pistol

By my relaxed standards, that degree of plane shift is so small that it represents a zero plane shift backswing. More importantly, plane shift is only important in the downswing, and I don't think that MN shifts planes in the downswing.

Jeff.
Jeff
I think it is best left as either someone shifts or they don't, not that he hardly shifts so lets ignore it. TGM is a precise system remember "not incomplete or vague"
John g
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-2008, 11:25 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
John

I think that you have misunderstood my position.

I agree that a golfer either shifts planes or he doesn't shift planes, and that there is no middle ground.

When I state that I have relaxed standards, it doesn't apply to the above statement. It applies to the accuracy of demonstrating a plane shift using still photographs from swing videos which are not free of camera angle distortion. The small degree of lifting up of the clubshaft above the clubshaft-at-address plane during the backswing in those still photos that I obtained from a swing video could be due to camera angle distortion, and may not represent a real plane shift.

I have never seen any swing video of MN that is free of camera angle distortion, so we may never be able to incontrovertibly determine whether he had a zero-plane shift swing, or not. However, there is a considerable amount of concordant evidence from multiple swing videos which suggest that he had a zero-plane shift swing.

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-03-2008, 12:09 PM
pistol pistol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 159
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
John

I think that you have misunderstood my position.

I agree that a golfer either shifts planes or he doesn't shift planes, and that there is no middle ground.

When I state that I have relaxed standards, it doesn't apply to the above statement. It applies to the accuracy of demonstrating a plane shift using still photographs from swing videos which are not free of camera angle distortion. The small degree of lifting up of the clubshaft above the clubshaft-at-address plane during the backswing in those still photos that I obtained from a swing video could be due to camera angle distortion, and may not represent a real plane shift.

I have never seen any swing video of MN that is free of camera angle distortion, so we may never be able to incontrovertibly determine whether he had a zero-plane shift swing, or not. However, there is a considerable amount of concordant evidence from multiple swing videos which suggest that he had a zero-plane shift swing.

Jeff.
jeff he shifts up ..its more evident in the longer clubs
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-03-2008, 01:06 PM
johnnyg johnnyg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
John

I think that you have misunderstood my position.

I agree that a golfer either shifts planes or he doesn't shift planes, and that there is no middle ground.

When I state that I have relaxed standards, it doesn't apply to the above statement. It applies to the accuracy of demonstrating a plane shift using still photographs from swing videos which are not free of camera angle distortion. The small degree of lifting up of the clubshaft above the clubshaft-at-address plane during the backswing in those still photos that I obtained from a swing video could be due to camera angle distortion, and may not represent a real plane shift.

I have never seen any swing video of MN that is free of camera angle distortion, so we may never be able to incontrovertibly determine whether he had a zero-plane shift swing, or not. However, there is a considerable amount of concordant evidence from multiple swing videos which suggest that he had a zero-plane shift swing.

Jeff.
Jeff
He shifts planes get over it!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> ERROR: The request could not be satisfied

504 Gateway Timeout ERROR

The request could not be satisfied.


We can't connect to the server for this app or website at this time. There might be too much traffic or a configuration error. Try again later, or contact the app or website owner.
If you provide content to customers through CloudFront, you can find steps to troubleshoot and help prevent this error by reviewing the CloudFront documentation.

Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront) HTTP3 Server
Request ID: Frtvlb6WorYNO019S8T7jgbOlDJkLm-QLH0aJgv2fqMUEYq1Tzw14Q==