View Single Post
  #5  
Old 07-27-2006, 10:39 AM
EdZ EdZ is offline
Lynn Blake Certified Instructor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Linn, OR
Posts: 1,645
Originally Posted by golfbulldog
Jim Furyk's swing is the living proof that you can get good impact alignments through a variety of components. It is always difficult with the whole "feel versus real" problem even for a top pro like Furyk to be sure of which component really makes him feel the clubhead. I would imagine that it is his lag sensation that is his clubhead feel ? maybe?

I am of the opinion that Jim's swing works well in the highest competition but he could swing even better with a more efficient pattern.

His natural talent makes his relatively inefficient swing work - imagine that same quantum of talent being used to power a more efficient swing!! Would I advise him to search for that swing pattern NOW ?? Only if he wants to become a global force like Woods or Els and win 4+ majors. Imagine Jim's hand eye coordination, steely grit AND a more efficient machine...

Plane is not defined by the clubshaft it is defined by the hands and the sweetspot.

The clubshaft lies on "A" plane - not "THE" plane - (unless zero #3 accumulator) it is the pressure points that should be monitored for a zero shift pattern IMO, and if you watch Furyk's hands (pressure points), you'll see that despite the odd looking motion, there is a very good reason he is as accurate as he is.... his hands stay quite close to 'on plane', on a fairly upright plane angle, for the majority of his motion.

Forget about the shaft - monitor the hands.
__________________
"Support the On Plane Swinging Force in Balance"

"we have no friends, we have no enemies, we have only teachers"

Simplicity buffs, see 5-0, 1-L, 2-0 A and B 10-2-B, 4-D, 6B-1D, 6-B-3-0-1, 6-C-1, 6-E-2

Last edited by EdZ : 07-27-2006 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote