Phew! That's a confusing post. I have no idea what you are talking about. I cannot even work out if you are trying to describe the backswing or downswing, or whether the shin bone is the left or right shin bone.
If I cannot understand your viewpoint, I cannot learn something new.
Phew! That's a confusing post. I have no idea what you are talking about. I cannot even work out if you are trying to describe the backswing or downswing, or whether the shin bone is the left or right shin bone.
If I cannot understand your viewpoint, I cannot learn something new.
Sigh!
Jeff.
Right shin bone...right tibia to you and me.
Backswing-transition into downswing...clue is in the video ...
Look at Yoda's transition in KOC's video....looks very nice...got your reverse K and everything!
The reference is to the plane Mr. Hogan spoke of in 5 Lessons.
This point you are arguing about the movement of Hogan's pelvis always revolves around the same images. There are many, many that are not staged performances of Mr. Hogan's swing after 1950.
I have a question for you now. Are you or is your company hiring? If so, I would like for you to hire me so that I can provide for my family, research golf, improve my own game and SPEND AS MUCH TIME ARGUING IN CYBERSPACE as you do.
I say this without being argumenative. I just don't understand why you don't take a closer look into Hogan's pivot sequence.
Yeah, I'm sure this is the same "Jeff" that likes to create arguments over at iseek as well. I think he basically tries to prove that he's the smartest man on earth. It gets old very quickly...
Whatever. His motives are immaterial to me. His points are what matter and they have been well thought out, well presented and civilised.
Attack the argument - not the man.