Homer Kelley chose to frame his ideas with precision and avoid explanation. TGM Concepts are very simple and very basic and very logical. I'm not surprised at the learning curve problem this caused. I am surprised, that given the rudimentary nature of the Pivot and Arm Motions/geometry of TGM that others haven't stumbled upon them a thousand times since. That confounds me much more than the learning curve problem.
Homer Kelley chose to frame his ideas with precision and avoid explanation. TGM Concepts are very simple and very basic and very logical. I'm not surprised at the learning curve problem this caused. I am surprised, that given the rudimentary nature of the Pivot and Arm Motions/geometry of TGM that others haven't stumbled upon them a thousand times since. That confounds me much more than the learning curve problem.
"Homer Kelley chose to frame his ideas with precision and avoid explanation"
I agree. He did avoid explanation.That's why I don't get it.
Homer Kelley chose to frame his ideas with precision and avoid explanation.
[Bold by Yoda.]
You know, Daryl, I hadn't thought about this, but it's true.
In his interest for brevity, Homer Kelley gave us only the 'answers' -- the distillation of his search for truth -- and left it to those of us interested to deduce the path by which those answers came.
No bibliography.
No references.
No 'selling points' vis-a-vis popular Tour Players.
Hybrid Mode
