YodasLuke wrote in my Ah-Ha 0002-2006 thread...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just started a new thread in The Lab, "the illusive and invisible sweetspot plane". It's in there because it might be a little over the top for those that live by the K.I.S.S. mantra.
Let me first apologize if my High Level of Frustration comes out, it is really intended to anyone, it is I am just frustrated. I ask questions, get quoted reference from the book which I have already referenced in my question. I can't get an answer other than what comes across is 'just accept it, believe it, etc.'.
Now I am not in anyway trying to disprove TGM, in fact what I am trying to do is get some clarification so it more understandable. I really don't understand, am I just as dumb as a box of rocks?
1. I have never said that the Sweet Spot Plane and Angle doesn't exist. In fact in part in my journey it is clear that the concept of the Sweet Spot Plane and Angle is what IMO bridges the gap between mechanics and feel.
2. My questions still go unanswered. Is there anyone who can just answer each question directly and not write a dissertation of generalities?
I would hope this doesn't go unresponded too but I believe in my other thread if you look at the questions, view the references, maybe you can show the error of my ways.
My quest started to just better understand analyzing videos/photos and understanding general golf terms applied to TGM to communicate clearly. Also I challenged the use of Plane Board, both in TGM and as a valid training aid and again, even in the initial post here validates my position that it is not validate if I am to accept the that there is no difference between the 'Feel' and 'Mechanics' in the swing.
If anyone wants I can repeat the questions and references in this thread.
Threaded Mode
