It seems to me, that this is the only thing that ever seems to get debated.
Ya it is a hot topic it seems. (important tho no?...look at all the responses even)
Look how easily we got on it this time around.
Quote:
I notice in another place in cyberspace that there is pictures of Lynn with a tripod (from a 10-5-E variation for hitting and a handheld hence non-level camera that is not square on the plane line, playing in the middle of winter in a windy day and I think he said he had 5 layers of clothes on - I might add). Through my work in 3d - just a few degrees out and you can find that you can totally change the impression of things. I mean its laughable, this is the guy that said he needs some solid scientific proof and he then takes from a ghosty and double compressed video and makes some suspicious pictures. Do you recon these where good conditions from which to judge???
Yes.
Quote:
Lack of their knowledge never allows them to debate anything else...
Yes.
Quote:
Unfortunately for the naysayers, this does not detract from the principle. And for every person that you can find that sways, I can find one with a perfectly centered pivot. There is the ideal and like in every game you play, every deviation of it - you lose....
It is possible and it is correct...
"Possible" I of course have no problem with. Even "possible to play world class golf with extreme precision"...no problem with that whatsoever.
Again: "Whatever works (best)."
...
However, it is "correct" (or "perfect" or "always ideal" or "superior" or w/e other rigid words) that I do not like....
...when it is given as the only option I mean.
And in my opinion, "you lose" is incorrect, or (at the very least) very incomplete.
Last edited by birdie_man : 11-17-2006 at 09:18 PM.
Threaded Mode
