Tell me how you really feel... ...No problem I think understand where you're coming from..No doubt about for me too about HK's book in it's efforts to describe and explain the golf swing..I believe it's second to none as far as consistent in depth details of the mechanics of the swing based on an inclined plane..
However, for me, it's still a method which "refers to the plans or procedures followed to accomplish a task or obtain a goal"...If you use the Ballard method, you hardly follow any of the plans or procedures to accomplish the same task..
Then you might retort, "Well, Ballard is in there with PP#4 etc" or you might say Ballard method is inferior and fleeting...I'd reply the Rocco did OK this year for 5 days in the Open, Calvin Peete, Hal & Curtis all hit it pretty darn straight..
Anyway, I'm here to learn from you folkes and maybe you can learn from me and not fight over semantics... Maybe we'll just have to agree to disagree
Feel free to ask me anything you want to know about the other high priests
...No problem I think understand where you're coming from..No doubt about for me too about HK's book in it's efforts to describe and explain the golf swing..I believe it's second to none as far as consistent in depth details of the mechanics of the swing based on an inclined plane..
Maybe we'll just have to agree to disagree
Threaded Mode
