10-2B vs. 10-2D - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

10-2B vs. 10-2D

The Golfing Machine - Advanced

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2005, 03:45 PM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Re: 10-2B vs. 10-2D
Originally Posted by EdZ
A question I have been pondering and experimenting with for a while now, the advantages and disadvantages of grip types 10-2B vs. 10-2D.

I've come full circle on this one, for my own swing. I had been using 10-2D with a pure swinging procedure, spent the last several months working more with 10-2B, and just came back to D.

I find that using B, I tend to push/hook with horizontal, and push/fade with angled. I tend to slip my alignments into a closed/closed (think Snead/Rocco), so generally this is a ball position\alignment problem for me, getting a bit below plane.

With 10-2D, I can use angled hinge with much more control, hitting with decent compression and a slight fade, or swinging with a 'gentle' horizontal hinge and getting a nice soft draw. In short, less rotation, more control and compression.

I understand why 10-2B is a better choice if you are fully utilizing extensor action, but honestly I see 10-2D as the 'better' choice for most.

Why then, does Homer list 10-2B as the option of choice in chapter 12? It seems to me that 10-2D would 'almost' always be a better choice between the two.

I'd love to understand more on this one.

Thanks - EZ
EdZ,

Do you usually use Standard or Single Wrist Action? Which grip works better for you with each of these?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.