There may be some question as to whether this guy or that guy is hitter or swinger but one look at the first swing even a novice like me could tell that swing was a classic, text book hitter.
And the thing that amazed me was that it didn't seem that difficult to do, very efficient. No bending the club past your head, no changing planes, no intricate manipulating of the wrists - just straight back, in and up on plane then BAM into the back of the ball as hard as you can. I know I couldn't hit it that far but I wonder if I watched it over and over and tried hard enough, could I possibly emulate that swing?
for once kostis didn't mess with jb's swing... textbook..did anyone notice that the clubhead didn't twist through impact just on an angle down through impact loved that shaft lean..160ydpw must be nice..hope he makes the masters this year off the money list
Let's hear it then Vandal. If it's not pure, then it's a swit. Otherwise it's a pure swing. There are a ton of switters on tour that get some pretty good distance. But not many that are in JB's league.
A swit can produce compression leakage and everyone is bound to have that happen, even the best of the swingers and hitters. But switters are particularly challenged with never experiencing the kind of distance and ball flight that each individual procedure has the potential to produce. So what is the primary procedure then? Is he driving, dragging, or both?