True...and there more than just two uncompensated patterns.
Can there be 3, 10, 100, or more uncompensated patterns?
If not, why is there a Chapter 10 for variations within the 24 components?
I'm clarifying my thoughts on switting as well. When looking at a players motion and specifically each component, if something doesn't exactly line up with the recommended variations in 12-1-0 or 12-2-0, does that mean it's a compensation?
Just more food for thought. See 13-0 Non-Interchangeable Components
There can be incompatible components inside of a swinging pattern that are not specific to hitting and vise-versa.
Hummm...what tag line can we call those?
Swatting and Hitching?
Charlie Barkelys?
Thanks,
Bagger
I personally think people are too hung up on is this Pro hitting or swinging. It is kind of like they are looking for some model to pattern themselves after.
As for 'pure' well I think Homer only reference this in 7-2. I think most are using it to define an 'Uncompensated' stroke.
If you have a shift in your swing, that being a defined component variation, is not the ideal component selection, and one could in fact say the extra movement is unnecessary and is a compensation.
Non-Interchangeable Components definitely would require compensations to overcome their effects be it in a hitting or swinging pattern.
Hybrid Mode
