Croker / Martin Green TGM hitters? - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Croker / Martin Green TGM hitters?

The Golfing Machine - Basic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2006, 12:13 PM
birdie_man's Avatar
birdie_man birdie_man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canader
Posts: 1,092
I think it's pretty much whatever you do best man.

However you can accelerate that club best to produce the 3 Imparatives most consistently....

...and straight compressed powerful shots.

Last edited by birdie_man : 08-23-2006 at 04:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-23-2006, 02:02 PM
danny_shank danny_shank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 113
Body type can be a factor
I think if your strong but lack flexability say like Hal Sutton you may be better suited to hitting. Opposite with swinging.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-23-2006, 02:41 PM
ColtsFan ColtsFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 220
thanks guys, seems like everyone from Green, to Coker, Evershed etc are Yellow Book deciples.

Birdie, have you ever heard of this Leslie King guy?

www.golfpro-online.com/tuition/lking/index.html

Definately a hands lead pivot guy....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-23-2006, 03:02 PM
lagster lagster is offline
LBG Pro Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 848
Croker
I have heard Peter Croker's swing analysis by a G.S.E.D.. He says this is a SWING. His talk about PUSHING, is relating more to Extensor Action.

Green... looks like a SWING also.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2006, 10:56 AM
Peter Croker Peter Croker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 16
EVOLVING from HITTING to SWINGING!
[quote=lagster]I have heard Peter Croker's swing analysis by a G.S.E.D.. He says this is a SWING. His talk about PUSHING, is relating more to Extensor Action.


Dear Lagster,

In the swing analysis done by Paul Hart (G.S.E.D.)I give my "preferred motion."
However for someone starting out into learning to swing a golf club, a shorter "Hitting" motion has less moving parts.

To me it is an evolution. The more skilled you become, the more relaxed you can make your muscles and the more the centrifugal force can take effect.

Alignments are first and then power follows. That is my take on it at this point in time.

Kind Regards,

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2006, 09:16 PM
DOCW3 DOCW3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 214
Mr. Croker (Peter)~

If there is one thing that distinguishes the CGS, for me it is the possibility of eliminating the hip slide in the transition and the coordination requirements that tax the skills of the "average amateur." If I understand your setup correctly, the impact spine tilt is preset at address and the move forward is more "rotational." A key to all of this is understanding how you define the pivot??

DRW

Last edited by DOCW3 : 08-25-2006 at 09:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-27-2006, 10:30 PM
ColtsFan ColtsFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 220
Birdie,

Exactly, the jumping around with swings is only impeding my improvement. Im going to get the 7th edt. before I see Lynn or Brian only because I feel like after studying multiple swings theories I could probably figure out a lot of the so called technical stuff after multiple readings.

Plus if Im going to hang out on this site I need to know the language, so to speak.
Thanks again for your input,youve been helpful....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-27-2006, 10:40 PM
Peter Croker Peter Croker is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 16
The PERFECT PIVOT for LEAST BACK STRAIN!
Originally Posted by DOCW3
Mr. Croker (Peter)~

If there is one thing that distinguishes the CGS, for me it is the possibility of eliminating the hip slide in the transition and the coordination requirements that tax the skills of the "average amateur." If I understand your setup correctly, the impact spine tilt is preset at address and the move forward is more "rotational." A key to all of this is understanding how you define the pivot??

DRW
Dear Doc,

You are spot on here! Hip slide is not necessary in any large degree when you preset and pivot as we recommend. There is much less chance of back and hip stress too!

Our Pivot Precision video download nails it best!

When the set up has the axis tilt in such an alignment to have the left side (from the hip down) in a vertical condition(our doorway drill for the stance and to help monitor the backswing pivot of the hips) - the hip rotation in the backswing has the right hip turning through the right heel and back in towards the left heel(Ben Hogan did this well). The right knee remains flexed and there is a spring loading of the base from the hips down.
With this coiling action, the left knee motion in the backswing is out in the direction of the left toes. This stops drifting towards the back foot.
This helps the spine tilt remain unchanged through the backswing and at transition, the left hip clears easily and rotates fully and attempts to unwind through the straightening left leg and back into the right foot (similar to a baseball player hitting a home run. At impact they are clearly hitting off and away from their rear foot.)
The releasing hands, arms and club act as a counter balance and the net result is some forward motion of the hips in most cases, but as we say "Shift happens!"
Words are not as good a svideo or "hands on" for understanding precisely what we mean, but this is my best shot at describing in words what the Pivot of the hips does and how to minimize hip slide and therefore the need for a higher skill level and timing.

I appreciate the interest in our TGM Pattern and I am keen to have a personal session with Lynne to share of 24 Component Definitions with "hands on" so that the best understandings can happen.

Kind Regards,
Peter Croker
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2006, 03:23 PM
danny_shank danny_shank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 113
Hi ColtsFan,

I know you asked birdie_man but i thought i'd reply as i was taught for about a year by a professional who was taught by Ledley King and graduated from his golf school in Knightsbridge.

IMO he has some interesting ideas but as an overall package it didn't help me, in fact to be honest it destroyed me. I found starting down with the hands particulary hard to implement and also the 'on-line' follow through i was taught didn't seem that compatable with an on-plane downswing.

I must stress though my experience shouldn't be taken as a reflection on Ledley King just how his method was taught to me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2006, 03:33 PM
ColtsFan ColtsFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 220
hey Danny,

interesting, so have you found more consistency starting down with your hips instead of your hands? I know the hips starting the DS tends to be the tradtional method, but didnt Homer like a hands lead pivot?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Peter Croker really a hitter? BIG_SEXY Emergency Room - Hitters 2 10-17-2006 09:20 PM
TGM Croker Golf Analysis ldeit The Golfing Machine - Advanced 28 06-13-2006 02:06 PM
Martin Hall on TGC dcg1952 The Clubhouse Lounge 45 12-26-2005 01:22 PM
Martin green push video davel The Golfing Machine - Basic 6 09-08-2005 09:31 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.