Homer Kelly was a great man. He has made a brilliant contribution to the golfing world. His work has greatly increased my understanding and application of the golf stroke. The errors we are discussing in this thread do not diminish the greatness of The Golfing Machine.
This purpose of this thread is to discuss some of the stuff Homer didn't get right. If you are convinced that Homer got every bit of the science and geometry correct, then this thread is not for you. Or if you don't care about these errors because it doesn't make a difference to your score, please go to the other sections of this site, where professional contributors such as Lynn Blake and Ted Fort are more than happy to help you with your game.
So...pleeeeease get back on topic!
Everyone gets things wrong at some point, in some way- Homer Kelley was no different. I'm all for understanding errors. So let's discuss it. (Refer to my original questions)
__________________
Life Goal- Developing a new theory of movement based on Brain Science
Interests - Dabbling with insanity
Hobbies- Creating Quality
It is very common to use the term 'vector' when plotting points, which is what Mr. Kelley was doing. Nowhere in the book does he claim that Inertia anything different than how it works under Newton's three laws. That would be a mistake in science- not plotting points in a legend about Horizontal Hinging.
So, is this something you discovered - or read from others still trying to rip HK's use of basic science?
Hybrid Mode
