|
Originally Posted by Delaware Golf
|
|
Originally Posted by brianmanzella
|
How many pics of Tiger's head moving around a whole lot more than this, when he won the Grand Slam?
|
Brian,
It's a shame you're taking the low road through a comparison.
DG
|
Guys, it all boils down to this: you see poor players with poor looking swings (1), good players with good looking swings (2),
poor players with good looking swings (3), and good players with poor looking swings (4).
Most people fit into the first two catergories.
Some questions to ponder on: should you
model a very good player with suboptimal mechanics? That's not even taking into account physical differences.
Learn the
best bits and disregard the rest (why should you try and learn something that is lest than optimal?). So if you think "xyz" has perfect impact alignments, then copy it! But if you think there's an issue with a certain component, and it doesn't really fit into your game, then trash that part!
More food for thought:
How good a swing
looks is based on personal opinion. There's no right or wrong. The mechanical superiority of a golf swing is
not based on personal opinion, but on the laws and principles of geometry and physics.
Hybrid Mode
