Daryl,
I'm very familar with TGM world and one of the first doctrate of TGM , taught me from day one I started playing and I went onto teaching TGM myself with a very good track record in teaching.
My clients are even better now I gave them physics.
One girl is 15, she went to all the best coaches and they all gave up on her. She couldn't break 100 and been playing for 3 years. When I worked with her in 12 months she is now breaking 75. Every week she breaks 80. All I gave her is physics.
Lag's hitting ,doesn't look like he does and at first I thought swinger visually the data tells the story a different story.
In TGM terms he's hitting according to his data.
Daryl have you ever listened to homers 120 hours of casette's speaking about TGM and touch on hitting and swinging? we'll worth listening to an eye opener.
Don't come back to me with garbage research interpretation. "According to TGM"? Where in TGM does Homer tell you that TGM Terminology works with your Data?
Quote:
Lag's hitting ,doesn't look like he does and at first I thought swinger visually the data tells the story a different story. In TGM terms he's hitting according to his data.
Your instruments may measure forces on your feet at release but do they tell you if the measured forces are caused by slapping vs. punching alignments? Ben Doyle states that Slapping is much more powerful than punching. He's been teaching TGM for 50 years. How many years have you taught TGM?
Shouldn't you rephrase your statement"Even with my limited TGM knowledge, Lag sure looks like he's a swinger, but he says he's hitting, so he must be a hitter, because he says so."
I don't know you or your teacher, I don't know Lagressure.
But if you and he want to peddle this, (4 + 1 + (2+3) +4 + 1+ 5) then go ahead. But if you claim that this is consistent with TGM then I say you have both lost your minds.
You guys are way off the 'Reservation' by re-defining TGM terminology to fit your own interpretation and agenda. That's not credible.
Hybrid Mode
