LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - Relationships . . . #3 Angle, Plane Angle, & Clubface Motion Thread: Relationships . . . #3 Angle, Plane Angle, & Clubface Motion View Single Post #20 03-12-2008, 02:18 AM Daryl Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Illinois Posts: 3,521 Originally Posted by EdZ With the same equipment? Do you assume that with any of these, impact fix is the ideal, with a 10-2-B Grip and proper wrist conditions? I don't clearly understand the question. But I was saying that a Golfer can use High or Low #3 Accumulator Angle on a Turned Shoulder Plane, with Zero Shift. I think that the Endless Belt Effect concept illustrates that The Clubhead will travel at the same RPM of the Hands but have different surface speeds. I believe that each Size Golfer has his one size pulley. He may compensate Hand Speed with the #3 Accumulator Angle. I think thats all that the concept and HK are saying. And, without a Straight Line Portion, then no endless belt effect, then the endless belt effect has no application to one large pulley for Circle Path Delivery. I don't think the Endless Belt Effect Concept supports attempting to change the Pulley Size. It's just my opinnion which is base on my level of understanding of the material. __________________ Daryl Last edited by Daryl : 03-12-2008 at 03:19 AM. Daryl View Public Profile Send a private message to Daryl Find all posts by Daryl