[KevCarter]

I do not think I have a command understanding of hinge action. Jorgenson's book is in the mail. i have experimented with my understanding of D-plane on a Trackman. Understanding what to trace made it a lot easier to zero out the numbers, or produce a particular shape of shot. I have hit too many shots with an unintended draw thinking that all had to do was trace the plane line (that also happened to be the target line...with a stance line that was generally square as well) and see unintended hook spin take the shot off line. I will have to read your post an additional time or two. To me what Jorgensen claims with regard to the so-called new ball flight laws Homer claimed along time ago. What is incompatible between TGM and D-plane? If your previous post was a full answer then I apologize for my density, and respectfully request that you dumb it down a bit for an okie. Perhaps this topic has already been flogged to glue and some digging in the archives is advisable? Has Yoda voiced his opinion on d matter? D-plane has breathed new life into my ball striking...but I have been snookered by siren calls before!

Hi Okie,

What do you feel was the biggest change you made with your new understanding? Face alignment, alignment of the path, or swing change? Or is it a little of each?

Thanks,
Kevin