?? 21st ??, the first 7 each containing significant andvances. And from where HK left there have been MANY with concepts they believe to be significant advances, but, only to be rebuffed because they were not where HK left his work. Is that a problem? Who is to be the arbitor?
HB
I agree. But I don't think that each of the 7 editions were significant advances. His concepts became more refined and clarified but they were super significant in the 1st Edition.
There are so many concepts that would need to move page by page and write them down as I go.
Threaded Mode
