This is a great visual. Through what sections of the stroke does covering the angle of approach delivery line apply? Specifically, is it covered beyond low point, as this quote implies (bolded above)?
If so, I have a problem closing the loop on this Angle of Approach procedure.
The intended inclined plane for this stroke has a 10-5-A configuration. The 10-5-E Delivery Line is just that - a delivery line that is a visual equivalent to the 10-5-A configuration. So if the 10-5-E delivery line is covered beyond low point, then the clubhead will be above the intended plane. The intended (geometric) plane line will be bent, violating a Basic Imperative.
I'm sure there is a flaw in my interpretation. Maybe it just "seems as if" the clubhead is above plane? I could use some help getting past this point.
Thanks.
3Putt,
Yes, the Clubhead continues to cover the Angle of Approach Delivery Line beyond Low Point. The linear Right Triceps thrust drives the Clubhead above the original Plane during the Follow-Through. Visualize Arnie Palmer and his thrust to 'right field' and his 'whirly bird' Finish.
The straight line Angle of Approach Delivery Line is arbitrarily determined via the Impact and Low Points of the Geometric Plane Line (Square Plane Line per 2-J-3). Once that Delivery Line is established, the original Plane Angle and Line are no longer utililized and thus no longer relevant. The steepness of the new Plane Angle agrees with the Angle of Approach thus established.
Once that Delivery Line is established, the original Plane Angle and Line are no longer utililized and thus no longer relevant.
This is the crux of the matter. Without your input, I would never have even contemplated that the original Plane Angle and Line could be considered "no longer relevant". After all, was that not the objective of the original stroke? I was viewing the Angle of Approach procedure as a mechanism to produce that on plane stroke (the original plane, that is)
Hybrid Mode
