Pivot center - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Pivot center

Golf By Jeff M

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-17-2008, 01:06 PM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
Yoda - at this time point we hold contrary viewpoints. I remain open to serious, well-intentioned input from interested forum members and I hope that their input can help clarify matters. I am willing to change my viewpoint in the face of a solidly convincing argument

The problem that I have with the idea that the "sweetspot must be in line with the PP#3 point" is the "belief" that there is a causal connection between the two observed phenomenon. In a swinger, there is no thrust at PP#3. A golfer senses/monitors clubhead lag at PP#3. However, sensing clubhead lag doesn't necessarily prevent a clubhead throwaway problem where the clubhead bypasses the hands near impact, or at impact. In this situation of i) the clubhead traveling at 160mph and the ii) hands slowing down just prior to impact, I can imagine that the golfer can lose his sense of clubhead lag pressure at PP#3 whether he likes it, or not. This loss of a sense of clubhead lag pressure at PP#3 would not necessarily occur if the clubhshaft was not capable of flexing in response to the clubhead's enormous pre-impact momentum, and I could then easily imagine a straight-line relationship between the PP#3 point and the clubface's sweetspot.

Jeff.

Last edited by Jeff : 12-17-2008 at 01:08 PM.
  #2  
Old 12-17-2008, 01:53 PM
Mike O's Avatar
Mike O Mike O is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,398
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
Yoda - at this time point we hold contrary viewpoints. I remain open to serious, well-intentioned input from interested forum members and I hope that their input can help clarify matters. I am willing to change my viewpoint in the face of a solidly convincing argument

The problem that I have with the idea that the "sweetspot must be in line with the PP#3 point" is the "belief" that there is a causal connection between the two observed phenomenon. In a swinger, there is no thrust at PP#3. A golfer senses/monitors clubhead lag at PP#3. However, sensing clubhead lag doesn't necessarily prevent a clubhead throwaway problem where the clubhead bypasses the hands near impact, or at impact. In this situation of i) the clubhead traveling at 160mph and the ii) hands slowing down just prior to impact, I can imagine that the golfer can lose his sense of clubhead lag pressure at PP#3 whether he likes it, or not. This loss of a sense of clubhead lag pressure at PP#3 would not necessarily occur if the clubhshaft was not capable of flexing in response to the clubhead's enormous pre-impact momentum, and I could then easily imagine a straight-line relationship between the PP#3 point and the clubface's sweetspot.

Jeff.

Jeff,
How do you think the club flexes during the golf swing? How would you differentiate between flexing and kick? If at all. How would these things change for a hitter versus a swinger? How would these things change if the plane angle was flat or upright? Look forward to your comments.
__________________
Life Goal- Developing a new theory of movement based on Brain Science
Interests - Dabbling with insanity
Hobbies- Creating Quality
  #3  
Old 12-17-2008, 02:21 PM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
Mike

Those are excellent questions. I don't know the answers.

I can understand that if a shaft flexes, that it has inherent elastic properties that will induce it to spring back to a straight line alignment. Therefore, when one sees a clubhead ahead of the hands/central clubshaft at impact - the question becomes - did that phenomenon happen because the clubhead's momentum caused the clubshaft to flex forwards or could there be a spring-back clubshaft-flex action due to the fact that the clubhead was lagging behind the clubshaft earlier in the downswing, causing the shaft to bend backwards, and now the clubshaft is simply flexing forwards in response to being previously stretched the other way (a whiplash action).

Do you have any insights to share that can differentiate between these two theoretical possibilities?

I imagine that the clubshaft should behave very differently between a hitter and a swinger. A hitter applies a push-force continuously on the clubshaft all the way through impact. I imagine that there is therefore less of a whiplash phenomenon. By contrast, a swinger induces a definitive whip lash motion, in the sense that pull-power is imparted to the clubshaft during the early-mid downswing, and no further power is imparted to the clubshaft during the near-impact phase of the downswing. At that time point, the clubshaft is moving towards impact due to the passive release of PA#2 ( due to centrifugal forces). I could imagine the clubshaft behaving very differently under those conditions.

Please share any insights you have regarding this matter.

I don't imagine that an upright versus a flat plane should have a significant effect. Do you?

Jeff.
  #4  
Old 12-17-2008, 03:05 PM
Mike O's Avatar
Mike O Mike O is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oceanside CA
Posts: 1,398
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
Mike

Those are excellent questions. I don't know the answers.

I can understand that if a shaft flexes, that it has inherent elastic properties that will induce it to spring back to a straight line alignment. Therefore, when one sees a clubhead ahead of the hands/central clubshaft at impact - the question becomes - did that phenomenon happen because the clubhead's momentum caused the clubshaft to flex forwards or could there be a spring-back clubshaft-flex action due to the fact that the clubhead was lagging behind the clubshaft earlier in the downswing, causing the shaft to bend backwards, and now the clubshaft is simply flexing forwards in response to being previously stretched the other way (a whiplash action).

Do you have any insights to share that can differentiate between these two theoretical possibilities?

I imagine that the clubshaft should behave very differently between a hitter and a swinger. A hitter applies a push-force continuously on the clubshaft all the way through impact. I imagine that there is therefore less of a whiplash phenomenon. By contrast, a swinger induces a definitive whip lash motion, in the sense that pull-power is imparted to the clubshaft during the early-mid downswing, and no further power is imparted to the clubshaft during the near-impact phase of the downswing. At that time point, the clubshaft is moving towards impact due to the passive release of PA#2 ( due to centrifugal forces). I could imagine the clubshaft behaving very differently under those conditions.

Please share any insights you have regarding this matter.

I don't imagine that an upright versus a flat plane should have a significant effect. Do you?

Jeff.

Do you have a photo of this long drive guy - at impact with the ball still on the face?
__________________
Life Goal- Developing a new theory of movement based on Brain Science
Interests - Dabbling with insanity
Hobbies- Creating Quality
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.