Flipping-golfing machine all wrong? - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Flipping-golfing machine all wrong?

The Golfing Machine - Basic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2010, 08:00 PM
airair airair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 5,930
Originally Posted by JerryG View Post
I could be wrong once again, but it is my understanding H.K. had the inner being of an engineer. To me, reading the book is all about science and engineering. His work was done over decades of observation, practice, practical application, etc. His work makes all of this discussion possible. Have it it, I say. Just don't get all hissy if I choose not to follow along. I have TGM and quite happy with it as I continue to learn each day.
I wasn't making any remarks against you - only saying something about science in general.
__________________

Air
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2010, 08:16 PM
Daryl's Avatar
Daryl Daryl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by airair View Post
I wasn't making any remarks against you - only saying something about science in general.
I think Homer Kelley understood the science. Some critics who can't understand Homer Kelley, need to have someone explain it to them in a way they can understand. The Laws of Physics haven't changed since Homer Kelley outlined ones that apply to the Golf Stroke.

Homer Kelley didn't invent or discover the Laws. Homer Kelley's genius didn't come from Laws he didn't discover, they came from the Alignments he did discover.

So far they "think" about-ish 1/10,000 of a millisecond between full compression and ball separation that may not significantly effect ball flight and that's questionable until it gets confirmed by other engineers. I can live with that. That's 1/10,000 of a millisecond I can live without and won't need to worry about anymore. Of course, I'm crossing my fingers that it becomes confirmed as soon as the testing equipment gets invented in my future grandsons lifetime.

I hope that doesn't throw my timing off. I'll find out tomorrow and get back to ya.
__________________
Daryl

Last edited by Daryl : 10-22-2010 at 09:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2010, 09:03 PM
John Graham John Graham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 79
I've never really thought of TGM as a science book. I've always taken the idea of it as an encyclopedia.
__________________
Make Everything.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-22-2010, 10:52 PM
JerryG JerryG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Lake Elmo, MN
Posts: 597
Originally Posted by airair View Post
I wasn't making any remarks against you - only saying something about science in general.

Air,
I certainly didn't take any offense. I enjoy your inquisitiveness. I just don't have that much to offer other than what I get from the book and the folks here.
g
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.