Right Arm Swing and 4 Barrel Swing - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Right Arm Swing and 4 Barrel Swing

The Golfing Machine - Advanced

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2008, 06:39 AM
Delaware Golf Delaware Golf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 773
Right Arm Swing and 4 Barrel Swing
Tomasello Australia "Chapter Series" videos - 4 Barrel Swing per 10-20-D and 7-3, 6-B-2-0 (both forearms start down)

Tomasello Myrtle Beach studio "Letter Series" videos - Right Arm Swing per 10-20-B and 7-3.

Tomasello July 1991 Golf Illustrated interview - Right Arm Swing per 10-20-B and 7-3.

Both swinging procedures utilize a throw from the top with the Right Forearm utilizing longitudinal acceleration (Lengthwise) per 10-19-C and 7-1.

When I studied with Tommy in October of 1993 at his Deer Track Resort studio and out on the driving range, he taught me a Right Arm Swing. Then Tommy handed me the Australia video series tape as I left his studio at the completion of my three-day school. The sequence of events now makes sense!!!

Learn the letter series video first, then move onto the chapter series. I hope you make the connection.




DG

Last edited by Delaware Golf : 06-06-2008 at 06:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2008, 09:30 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
DG

Could you please expand on the Tomasello right arm 4-B swing?

I can understand a swinger using a three barrel swing, but I cannot clearly understand how the Tomasello 4-B right arm swing works. Where exactly is the right arm and right forearm active in a right arm 4-B downswing, and is that activity isometric and/or isotonic?

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2008, 10:32 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
DG

I have viewed the chapter series and the letter.

Tom doesn't explain the biomechanics of the right arm throw action or formulate a causal relationship between the right forearm throw and the downswing pivot action.

How does a right forearm throw work in terms of which muscle is active, and whether it is isometetrically or isotonically active, and when exactly it's active?

I also cannot understand an automatic causal connection between a right arm throw and lower body activity.

Peter Croker also proposes such a causal connection in his hand swing theory - see http://www.petercroker.com/englisch/...olferapril.htm

However, both Peter Croker and Tom Tomasello are both presuming that the lower body will respond appropriately. However, "appropriate" with respect to the downswing pivot action could be considered to be a learned behaviour and not necessarily an automatic action.

Finally, how does a right arm throw improve on the alternative of starting a downswing pivot action with a right shoulder throw (as per 10-20-C)?

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2008, 11:18 AM
Delaware Golf Delaware Golf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 773
Bio-Mechanics
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
DG

I have viewed the chapter series and the letter.

Tom doesn't explain the biomechanics of the right arm throw action or formulate a causal relationship between the right forearm throw and the downswing pivot action.

How does a right forearm throw work in terms of which muscle is active, and whether it is isometetrically or isotonically active, and when exactly it's active?

I also cannot understand an automatic causal connection between a right arm throw and lower body activity.

Peter Croker also proposes such a causal connection in his hand swing theory - see http://www.petercroker.com/englisch/...olferapril.htm

However, both Peter Croker and Tom Tomasello are both presuming that the lower body will respond appropriately. However, "appropriate" with respect to the downswing pivot action could be considered to be a learned behaviour and not necessarily an automatic action.

Finally, how does a right arm throw improve on the alternative of starting a downswing pivot action with a right shoulder throw (as per 10-20-C)?

Jeff.
Jeff,

Where does Homer write about Bio-mechanics in TGM? The pivot does respond to the right forearm.....Tommy talks about the response of the pivot to the right forearm in both video series. The trigger types are options... one needs to experiment with all of them to decide what works best for you...not sure what the correct sampling process you would need to determine what trigger type is the most effective (get all 5000 LBG members using a different trigger type....then you have to deal skill level, body type, practice time, etc....LOL). Homer has laid out the components according to their difficulty in execution. I guess the relationship between the components could be thought of in a risk/reward relationship. I tend not to be risk adverse. I enjoy the thrill/risk of cracking a 300 yard drive with hitting the ball a little off-line and I do mean a little!!!

DG

Last edited by Delaware Golf : 06-06-2008 at 11:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2008, 11:35 AM
Delaware Golf Delaware Golf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 773
Erie Els an Arm Swinger
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
DG

I have viewed the chapter series and the letter.

Tom doesn't explain the biomechanics of the right arm throw action or formulate a causal relationship between the right forearm throw and the downswing pivot action.

How does a right forearm throw work in terms of which muscle is active, and whether it is isometetrically or isotonically active, and when exactly it's active?

I also cannot understand an automatic causal connection between a right arm throw and lower body activity.

Peter Croker also proposes such a causal connection in his hand swing theory - see http://www.petercroker.com/englisch/...olferapril.htm

However, both Peter Croker and Tom Tomasello are both presuming that the lower body will respond appropriately. However, "appropriate" with respect to the downswing pivot action could be considered to be a learned behaviour and not necessarily an automatic action.

Finally, how does a right arm throw improve on the alternative of starting a downswing pivot action with a right shoulder throw (as per 10-20-C)?

Jeff.
Check out these excerpts from Erie Els book "How to Build a Classic Golf Swing". Erie appears to be one PGA golfer who swings the golf club like the way Tom Tomasello taught the golf swing.

Page 126

I start with my feet firmly planted and as I draw my arm back (per TGM Right Forearm Takeaway and cocking the right elbow per The Magic of the Right Forearm 7-3), my weight transfers back over on to my right side in harmony with the movement of my arm. Then as I bring my arm forward to release the ball, my weight simultaneously shifts over on to my front foot. If I didn't do that, the ball wouldn't go far. Yet this happens naturally on to my front foot without me even having to think about it.

....If you're copying me now you'll realise that in all of these actions, you don't really have to think about the role of your body. It behaves quite instinctively as your arm moves back and forth (Magic of the Right Forearm again). The golf swing isn't such an instinctive, natural movement, but the theories are exactly the same. You can't generate power unless your weight is in harmony with the swining movement of your arms and the club. That's what is meant by good weight transfer.

No wonder so many golfers are befiddled by the smooth swing of Erie....he doesn't swing the club by starting with the lower body...

Last edited by Delaware Golf : 06-06-2008 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2008, 01:16 PM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
DG

Let's see if we can agree on certain fundamentals.

I believe that one needs to keep the power package assembly intact in the early downswing, which means that one must maintain the right flying wedge intact, while the lower body undergoes a pelvis shift rotation movement - irrespective of the downswing trigger.

Do you agree?

Here is posed photo of Hogan's swing demonstrating what I mean.



The yellow colored area represents the power package assembly and I think that it should be intact at this point in the downswing - intact despite the fact that the hips have rotated about 45 degrees to a hip squaring position, and despite the fact that the entire pelvis has shifted a little left-laterally as one puts weight on the left foot.

Now, has does a golfer get to this position? Ben Hogan states that he thinks of starting the downswing with a lower body move - a pelvis shift-rotation move (hip squaring action) that pulls the power package assembly downwards . I used to start my downswing this way, but it was problematic for me because I tended to suffer from one-or more of these problems - i) too much left-lateral hip slide; ii) a tendency to move my hips too fast and out-of-synch with my upper torso, iii) a tendency to spin my pelvis and roundhouse my upper body. I now initiate my downswing with a right shoulder throw action downplane - and this works better for me because the right shoulder throw downplane causes my pelvis to move the correct amount as a result of a transmitted force going down the spine (right shoulder moves downplane => causes the spine to develop secondary axis tilt and simultaneously produces a transmitted force that passes down the rightwards tilted spine to the pelvis => pelvis shift-rotates to a hip squaring orientation). In other words, I still end up looking like Hogan at this point in the downswing - with a squared pelvis and the power package intact and the right elbow approximated to the right hip. My power package remains intact because during the right shoulder throw action, I also isometrically contract my right arm/forearm muscles in order to maintain the right arm flying wedge angles intact.

Now, if a golfer states that he trigger-starts the downswing with a right forearm throw, I can imagine that golfer end-up looking like Hogan if the right forearm throw is i) a throw of the entire power package assembly (as an intact unit) down towards the right hip area and ii) the right forearm is in a state of isometric contraction (and not isotonic contraction, which would straighten the right elbow and prematurely release power accumulator #1). Is my description of the right forearm throw action (that initiates the downswing) representative of Tom Tomasello's approach, or is it totally different?

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2008, 02:14 PM
12 piece bucket's Avatar
12 piece bucket 12 piece bucket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thomasville, NC
Posts: 4,380
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
DG

Let's see if we can agree on certain fundamentals.

I believe that one needs to keep the power package assembly intact in the early downswing, which means that one must maintain the right flying wedge intact, while the lower body undergoes a pelvis shift rotation movement - irrespective of the downswing trigger.

Do you agree?

Here is posed photo of Hogan's swing demonstrating what I mean.



The yellow colored area represents the power package assembly and I think that it should be intact at this point in the downswing - intact despite the fact that the hips have rotated about 45 degrees to a hip squaring position, and despite the fact that the entire pelvis has shifted a little left-laterally as one puts weight on the left foot.

Now, has does a golfer get to this position? Ben Hogan states that he thinks of starting the downswing with a lower body move - a pelvis shift-rotation move (hip squaring action) that pulls the power package assembly downwards . I used to start my downswing this way, but it was problematic for me because I tended to suffer from one-or more of these problems - i) too much left-lateral hip slide; ii) a tendency to move my hips too fast and out-of-synch with my upper torso, iii) a tendency to spin my pelvis and roundhouse my upper body. I now initiate my downswing with a right shoulder throw action downplane - and this works better for me because the right shoulder throw downplane causes my pelvis to move the correct amount as a result of a transmitted force going down the spine (right shoulder moves downplane => causes the spine to develop secondary axis tilt and simultaneously produces a transmitted force that passes down the rightwards tilted spine to the pelvis => pelvis shift-rotates to a hip squaring orientation). In other words, I still end up looking like Hogan at this point in the downswing - with a squared pelvis and the power package intact and the right elbow approximated to the right hip. My power package remains intact because during the right shoulder throw action, I also isometrically contract my right arm/forearm muscles in order to maintain the right arm flying wedge angles intact.

Now, if a golfer states that he trigger-starts the downswing with a right forearm throw, I can imagine that golfer end-up looking like Hogan if the right forearm throw is i) a throw of the entire power package assembly (as an intact unit) down towards the right hip area and ii) the right forearm is in a state of isometric contraction (and not isotonic contraction, which would straighten the right elbow and prematurely release power accumulator #1). Is my description of the right forearm throw action (that initiates the downswing) representative of Tom Tomasello's approach, or is it totally different?

Jeff.

Jeff . . . not to be nitpicky (which I reckon means I'm gonna be nitpicky) . . . but the shoulders are PART OF THE POWER PACKAGE . . . Your pattern is valid BUT you are not benefiting from the entire radius via Swinging from the Feet if you aren't starting the swing from the ground up. The radius ends at the first nonlagging component closest to the ground.
__________________
Aloha Mr. Hand

Behold my hands; reach hither thy hand
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-06-2008, 02:20 PM
Yoda's Avatar
Yoda Yoda is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 10,681
When Harry Met Sally
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post

DG

Let's see if we can agree on certain fundamentals.

I believe that one needs to keep the power package assembly intact in the early downswing . . .

Do you agree?

Now, if a golfer states that he trigger-starts the downswing with a right forearm throw, I can imagine that golfer end-up looking like Hogan if the right forearm throw is i) a throw of the entire power package assembly (as an intact unit) down towards the right hip area and ii) the right forearm is in a state of isometric contraction (and not isotonic contraction, which would straighten the right elbow and prematurely release power accumulator #1). Is my description of the right forearm throw action (that initiates the downswing) representative of Tom Tomasello's approach, or is it totally different?

[Bold emphasis by Yoda.]
Run and hide, everybody!



__________________
Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2008, 04:44 AM
golfbulldog golfbulldog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 647
Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
I also cannot understand an automatic causal connection between a right arm throw and lower body activity.

Peter Croker also proposes such a causal connection in his hand swing theory - see http://www.petercroker.com/englisch/...olferapril.htm

However, both Peter Croker and Tom Tomasello are both presuming that the lower body will respond appropriately. However, "appropriate" with respect to the downswing pivot action could be considered to be a learned behaviour and not necessarily an automatic action.

Jeff.
Good point about learnt or automatic...they might be the same if automatic assumes the player understands some key constraints. (in reality no human can assume this from a naive condition...so most of us have to learn and train pivots).

Now you can learn the pivot motion which will enable the right forearm to do its job ...or you can learn the right forearm motion and secondarily discover what your pivot then needs to do to accomodate this motion. Either way there is a degree of learning/training.

I think that the right forearm motion described by DG, TT and EE can become the centre of focus for a player if their right forearm has learnt to move within a "machine" which has certain constraints (constraints on movement)...or "essentials"...or "imperatives" which must always be in place for the right forearm to dictate to the pivot...

The right forearm does not dictate or directly force pivot to respond in a sequential manner...the pivot makes preparatory moves to allow the right forearm to move in its desired manner , beyond impact to both arms straight. It does this unconsciously to allow the constraints on machine to be maintained....


Those constraints are that lag pressure is maintained, straight plane line, steady head, balance etc...you have seen most of these somewhere before

SO... you need 3 essentals, 3 imperatives and straight plane line (most notably through impact)....if your pivot has been programmed to achieve these...then and only then will the right forearm...or hand for that matter...appear to cause movement of the pivot.

PLEASE NOTE...that appearance of right forearm causing pivot movement occurs to the player him/herself alone!!!....why to them alone because that is where their conscious brain is focussed. To the video camera it will still appear that the hips are moving first...and they are.... but they have learnt that they have to do that if the right forearm is going to take its intended path beyond impact and all other contraints are in place and maintained.

If you had an automaton which could automatically maintain balance and steady head etc....then all you would have to do is program in the right forearm flight plan and the automaton wold make sure everything else moved in an appropriate way.... but the human needs some learning...and you can train from the outside - in (move the hands as directed and let the pivot work out what it has to do) or learn from the inside out ( train that pivot so that , as long as the hands do nothing, the hands end up right)

Most people choose the latter, TT and HK were suggesting the former...although Homer would probably have started with zone 1 (pivot essentially) if it were particularly unruly.

Here endeth the lesson...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2008, 08:38 AM
Jeff Jeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 701
Golfbulldog

Excellent post - and very well expressed.

I agree with you 100%. I, for example, am an imperfect golfer due to a host of physical disabilities eg. a severe lack of hula-hula flexibility. I therefore have a compensated downswing pivot action. After studying TGM, I got the idea from TGM to start the downswing pivot action with a right shoulder thrust action rather than a pelvic shift-rotation movement. The final "effect" is the same - the downswing pivot action starts from the ground-up. I am also aware of the magic of the right forearm - although my conscious mind is focused on the right shoulder thrust action, I am very cognizant of the fact that the downswing pivot action is subservient to the greater goal of moving the right forearm in a certain way down towards the impact zone that allows me to trace a SPL and that also allows the right forearm to end up behind the shaft at impact so as to support the shaft through impact. At times, when my downswing pivot action is unusually fluid, I switch my conscious mind to my right forearm action and I often "feel" that I am throwing the right forearm from the top of the backstroke position. I am still hoping to discover from DG whether that "right forearm throw" feeling is the same right forearm throw action that Tom talks about in his swing videos.

Jeff.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.