Well i've given basic motion with zero pivot a good try, but it's not for me. As a swinger i feel it's just rehearsing probably my worst fault which is over acceleration.
I've been practicing a shot of a similar length that just involves my pivot transporting the flying wedges. This seems to be benefiting my game and in my case i can't see how having the pivot component involved makes it harder to educate the hands.
Well i've given basic motion with zero pivot a good try, but it's not for me. As a swinger i feel it's just rehearsing probably my worst fault which is over acceleration.
I've been practicing a shot of a similar length that just involves my pivot transporting the flying wedges. This seems to be benefiting my game and in my case i can't see how having the pivot component involved makes it harder to educate the hands.
I had the exact same issue , until I met Comdpa and he pointed out and demonstrated to me regarding zero pivot . I suggest don't hurry the incubator.. take some time to try understand this and one day the egg will surely hatch. But one thing i can tell you, you are on the right track to follow Comdpa's suggestion . We cannot keep the whole left arm rigid or glued to your pects. nobody really does that . But neither should the left arm is totally independant of the pects. the pressure point 4 is there for a reason.
There is nothing wrong for the pivot to transport your hands, in fact personally I like it too as a swinger and preferred by swingers. The very difficult part for people to understand is how this pivot transport will make your forearm on plane and your hand on plane.. or how your arm/hand move and how your body have to support this movement in order to be On plane. a chicken ,egg problem in my opinion that you will hear tons of debates , confusion and very angry people. XDDDD.
I got a feeling this TGM forum, Or TGM book is not about quick fix .. the only quick fix you will get is really get a TGM coach to demonstrate the motion, you will understand in a fraction of time( see yodaluke in amazing changes section). This forum i believe is more for the core understanding of TGM, the book, the concept, and the genius behind Homer Kelly. Therefore.. Whisper " These people hates quick fix, they are perfectionist in precision and a true mechanics of golf"
__________________
God :God is love.
Latest incubator: Finally appreciate why Hogan wrote 19 pages on GRIP. I bet he could write another 40 pages.
I understand what your saying nuke99. I know there is only so much you can glean from a golf forum. I've learnt a lot here but i am aware i have only reached the tip of the iceberg. My problems with basic motion with zero pivot may very well be because of a lack of understanding and/or poor execution, i'll certainly keep an open mind. Like you said i really do need to see an AI (i've got plans to do this when my financial situation looks a bit more rosey).
I'm not a quick fix kind of guy, but i'm also not going to blindly follow something that seems to be doing me more harm than good (i've done that too many times in golf instruction already). I'm just doing what seems best for me at this stage and i've certainly had more benefits with the pivot orientated basic motion.
Well I suggest take a good look at that again. only the No.1 accumulator moves.. Nothing else.
Comdpa , who i have the pleasure learning from is not in the same country as I am, so it becomes harder for a totally untrained average golfer.At few stages, my was paralyzed by my analysis! A sure sign of rushing an incubator...
Understanding the book is one thing. Choosing the right model and component another, choosing the model for the right reason is another, Executing is another matter again. Thats how hard it is without attending a complete workshop or an AI around. Not easy for me my friend.. just to share with you.
__________________
God :God is love.
Latest incubator: Finally appreciate why Hogan wrote 19 pages on GRIP. I bet he could write another 40 pages.
Hybrid Mode
